Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26414617›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of pathology2016

Regeneration versus scarring in vertebrate appendages and heart.

Anna Jaźwińska, Pauline Sallin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of pathology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Unlocking cardiomyocyte renewal potential for myocardial regeneration therapy.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2023
    Review
  9. The salamander blastema within the broader context of metazoan regeneration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  10. Molecular characterization of the immediate wound response of the solitary ascidian Polycarpa mytiligera.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. MAPK/ERK Pathway as a Central Regulator in Vertebrate Organ Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Cell Hypertrophy: A "Biophysical Roadblock" to Reversing Kidney Injury.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Wound-healing capabilities of whale sharks (Conservation physiology · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. The Future of Direct Cardiac Reprogramming: AnyInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna JaźwińskaDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Switzerland.
Pauline SallinDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Switzerland.
University of Fribourg · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Injuries to complex human organs, such as the limbs and the heart, result in pathological conditions, for which we often lack adequate treatments. While modern regenerative approaches are based on the transplantation of stem cell-derived cells, natural regeneration in lower vertebrates, such as zebrafish and newts, relies predominantly on the intrinsic plasticity of mature tissues. This property involves local activation of the remaining material at the site of injury to promote cell division, cell migration and complete reproduction of the missing structure. It remains an unresolved question why adult mammals are not equally competent to reactivate morphogenetic programmes. Although organ regeneration depends strongly on the proliferative properties of cells in the injured tissue, it is apparent that various organismic factors, such as innervation, vascularization, hormones, metabolism and the immune system, can affect this process. Here, we focus on a correlation between the regenerative capacity and cellular specialization in the context of functional demands, as illustrated by appendages and heart in diverse vertebrates. Elucidation of the differences between homologous regenerative and non-regenerative tissues from various animal models is essential for understanding the applicability of lessons learned from the study of regenerative biology to clinical strategies for the treatment of injured human organs.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalAnimal FinsAnimalsAnimal StructuresCaudataCell DifferentiationCell DivisionCell MovementCicatrixHeartHumansMammalsMyocytes, CardiacRegenerationZebrafishblastemacardiomyocytecellular specializationcytodifferentiationepimorphosisfibroblastfinlimburodelewound epidermiszebrafish

Identifiers

PMID26414617
PMCPMC5057359
OpenAlexW2101678761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.