The Role of Decision Aids in Depression Care.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
   Pooled it
2. Efficacy of Buprenorphine/Naloxone Rapidly Dissolving Sublingual Tablets (BNX-RDT) After Switching From BNX Sublingual Film.Journal of addiction medicine
   Trial
3. Comparison of analog and digital patient decision aids for the treatment of depression: a scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2023
   Article
4. Effects of decision aids for depression treatment in adults: systematic review.BJPsych bulletin · 2022
   Review
5. Personalise antidepressant treatment for unipolar depression combining individual choices, risks and big data (PETRUSHKA): rationale and protocol.Evidence-based mental health · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Shared Decision Making for Antidepressants in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Trial.2015

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as