Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26414507›Full record

ArticleRadiation research2015

Accelerator-Based Biological Irradiation Facility Simulating Neutron Exposure from an Improvised Nuclear Device.

Yanping Xu, Gerhard Randers-Pehrson, Helen C Turner, Stephen A Marino, Charles R Geard, David J Brenner, Guy Garty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Modeling the Effects of Protracted Cosmic Radiation in a Human Organ-on-Chip Platform.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The NIAID/RNCP Biodosimetry Program: An Overview.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Neutron Radiobiology and Dosimetry.Radiation research · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yanping Xua  Radiological Research Accelerator Facility, Columbia University, Irvington, New York 10533 and.
Gerhard Randers-Pehrsona  Radiological Research Accelerator Facility, Columbia University, Irvington, New York 10533 and.
Helen C Turnerb  Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032.
Stephen A Marinoa  Radiological Research Accelerator Facility, Columbia University, Irvington, New York 10533 and.
Charles R Gearda  Radiological Research Accelerator Facility, Columbia University, Irvington, New York 10533 and.
David J Brennerb  Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032.
Guy Gartya  Radiological Research Accelerator Facility, Columbia University, Irvington, New York 10533 and.

Funding

Sample Engineering CoreU19AI067773 · NIAID · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI FORNACE, ALBERT J · 2005 to 2024
$105.4M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI067773NIAID NIH HHS U19-AI067773
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe here an accelerator-based neutron irradiation facility, intended to expose blood or small animals to neutron fields mimicking those from an improvised nuclear device at relevant distances from the epicenter. Neutrons are generated by a mixed proton/deuteron beam on a thick beryllium target, generating a broad spectrum of neutron energies that match those estimated for the Hiroshima bomb at 1.5 km from ground zero. This spectrum, dominated by neutron energies between 0.2 and 9 MeV, is significantly different from the standard reactor fission spectrum, as the initial bomb spectrum changes when the neutrons are transported through air. The neutron and gamma dose rates were measured using a custom tissue-equivalent gas ionization chamber and a compensated Geiger-Mueller dosimeter, respectively. Neutron spectra were evaluated by unfolding measurements using a proton-recoil proportional counter and a liquid scintillator detector. As an illustration of the potential use of this facility we present micronucleus yields in single divided, cytokinesis-blocked human peripheral lymphocytes up to 1.5 Gy demonstrating 3- to 5-fold enhancement over equivalent X-ray doses. This facility is currently in routine use, irradiating both mice and human blood samples for evaluation of neutron-specific biodosimetry assays. Future studies will focus on dose reconstruction in realistic mixed neutron/photon fields.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalNeutronsNuclear WarfareAnimalsHumansMicronucleus Tests

Identifiers

PMID26414507
PMCPMC4613771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.