Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26413749›Full record

Trial reportArthritis care & research2016

Spironolactone for People Age 70 Years and Older With Osteoarthritic Knee Pain: A Proof-of-Concept Trial.

Marion E T Mcmurdo, Deepa Sumukadas, Peter T Donnan, Vera Cvoro, Petra Rauchhaus, Ishbel Argo, Helen Waldie, Roberta Littleford, Allan D Struthers, Miles D Witham

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arthritis care & research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 76% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Pain mechanisms in the transgender individual: a review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marion E T McmurdoUniversity of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Deepa SumukadasUniversity of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Peter T DonnanUniversity of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Vera CvoroVictoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy, Fife, UK.
Petra RauchhausUniversity of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Ishbel ArgoUniversity of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Helen WaldieUniversity of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Roberta LittlefordNinewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK.
Allan D StruthersUniversity of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Miles D WithamUniversity of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
University of Dundee · GBNinewells Hospital · GBVictoria Hospital · GB

Funding

Versus Arthritis 20228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether spironolactone could benefit older people with osteoarthritis (OA), based on a previous study showing that spironolactone improved quality of life.

methodsThis parallel-group, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial randomized community-dwelling people ages ≥70 years with symptomatic knee OA to 12 weeks of 25 mg daily oral spironolactone or matching placebo. The primary outcome was between-group difference in change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale scores. Secondary outcomes included WOMAC stiffness and physical function subscores, EuroQol 5-domain (EQ-5D) 3L score, and mechanistic markers. Analysis was by intent to treat, using mixed-model regression, adjusting for baseline values of test variables.

resultsA total of 421 people had eligibility assessed, and 86 were randomized. Mean ± SD age was 77 ± 5 years and 53 of 86 (62%) were women. Adherence to study medication was 99%, and all participants completed the 12-week assessment. No significant improvement was seen in the WOMAC pain score (adjusted treatment effect 0.5 points [95% confidence interval (95% CI) - 0.3, 1.3]; P = 0.19). No improvement was seen in WOMAC stiffness score (0.2 points [95% CI -0.6, 1.1]; P = 0.58), WOMAC physical function score (0.0 points [95% CI -0.7, 0.8]; P = 0.98), or EQ-5D 3L score (0.04 points [95% CI -0.04, 0.12]; P = 0.34). Cortisol, matrix metalloproteinase 3, and urinary C-telopeptide of type II collagen were not significantly different between groups. More minor adverse events were noted in the spironolactone group (47 versus 32), but no increase in death or hospitalization was evident.

conclusionSpironolactone did not improve symptoms, physical function, or health-related quality of life in older people with knee OA.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overArthralgiaDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisKnee JointMaleMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsOsteoarthritis, KneePain MeasurementRegression AnalysisSeverity of Illness IndexSpironolactoneTreatment OutcomeMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsSpironolactone

Identifiers

PMID26413749
PMCPMC4855683
OpenAlexW2464813240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.