Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26413566›Full record

ArticleSurgery research and practice2015

Comparison of Subcuticular Suture Materials in Cesarean Skin Closure.

Pınar Solmaz Hasdemir, Tevfik Guvenal, Hasan Tayfun Ozcakir, Faik Mumtaz Koyuncu, Gonul Dinc Horasan, Mustafa Erkan, Semra Oruc Koltan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery research and practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07582679 (Polypropylene Versus Polyglactin in Upper Limb Subcuticular Skin Closure), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07582679 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Polypropylene Versus Polyglactin in Upper Limb Subcuticular Skin Closure: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorShebin El-Kom Teaching HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsCompare Cosmetic Outcomes of Subcuticular Skin Closure Using Polypropylene and PolyglactinArmsUpper limb wounds subcuticular skin closure with Polypropylene, Upper limb wounds subcuticular skin closure with Polyglactin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Comparison of Nonabsorbable and Absorbable Suture in Total Knee Arthroplasty.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pınar Solmaz HasdemirDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Celal Bayar University Medical School, 45000 Manisa, Turkey.
Tevfik GuvenalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Celal Bayar University Medical School, 45000 Manisa, Turkey.
Hasan Tayfun OzcakirDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Celal Bayar University Medical School, 45000 Manisa, Turkey.
Faik Mumtaz KoyuncuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Celal Bayar University Medical School, 45000 Manisa, Turkey.
Gonul Dinc HorasanDepartment of Statistics, Celal Bayar University Medical School, Manisa, Turkey.
Mustafa ErkanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Celal Bayar University Medical School, 45000 Manisa, Turkey.
Semra Oruc KoltanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Celal Bayar University Medical School, 45000 Manisa, Turkey.
Manisa Celal Bayar University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim. Comparison of the rate of wound complications, pain, and patient satisfaction based on used subcuticular suture material. Methods. A total of 250 consecutive women undergoing primary and repeat cesarean section with low transverse incision were prospectively included. The primary outcome was wound complication rate including infection, dehiscence, hematoma, and hypertrophic scar formation within a 6-week period after operation. Secondary outcomes were skin closure time, the need for use of additional analgesic agent, pain score on numeric rating scale, cosmetic score, and patient scar satisfaction scale. Results. Absorbable polyglactin was used in 108 patients and nonabsorbable polypropylene was used in 142 patients. Wound complication rates were similar in primary and repeat cesarean groups based on the type of suture material. Skin closure time is longer in nonabsorbable suture material group in both primary and repeat cesarean groups. There was no difference between groups in terms of postoperative pain, need for additional analgesic use, late phase pain, and itching at the scar. Although the cosmetic results tended to be better in the nonabsorbable group in primary surgery patients, there was no significant difference in the visual satisfaction of the patients. Conclusions. Absorbable and nonabsorbable suture materials are comparable in cesarean section operation skin closure.

Identifiers

PMID26413566
PMCPMC4564673
OpenAlexW1677062866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.