Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26413514›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2015

Epidemiological Scenario of Dengue in Brazil.

Rafaelle C G Fares, Katia P R Souza, Germán Añez, Maria Rios

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The greatest Dengue epidemic in Brazil: Surveillance, Prevention, and Control.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rafaelle C G FaresUnited States Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA.
Katia P R SouzaUnited States Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA.
Germán AñezUnited States Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA.
Maria RiosUnited States Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dengue is the most important reemerging mosquito-borne viral disease worldwide. It is caused by any of four Dengue virus types or serotypes (DENV-1 to DENV-4) and is transmitted by mosquitoes from the genus Aedes. Ecological changes have favored the geographic expansion of the vector and, since the dengue pandemic in the Asian and Pacific regions, the infection became widely distributed worldwide, reaching Brazil in 1845. The incidence of dengue in Brazil has been frequently high, and the number of cases in the country has at some point in time represented up to 60% of the dengue reported cases worldwide. This review addresses vector distribution, dengue outbreaks, circulating serotypes and genotypes, and prevention approaches being utilized in Brazil.

Indexed as

BrazilDengueDisease OutbreaksHumansIncidence

Identifiers

PMID26413514
PMCPMC4568054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.