Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26413348›Full record

ArticleArab journal of urology2015

The efficacy of different doses of solifenacin in elderly patients after treating a urinary tract infection.

Kirill V Kosilov, Sergay A Loparev, Marina A Ivanovskaya, Liliya V Kosilova

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arab journal of urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kirill V KosilovSchool of Humanities, Far Eastern Federal University, Russian Federation.
Sergay A LoparevDepartment of Urology, City Polyclinic No. 3, Russian Federation.
Marina A IvanovskayaFar Eastern Fisheries University, Russian Federation.
Liliya V KosilovaDepartment of the Functional Methods of Examination, Medical Association No. 2 of Vladivostok City, Vladivostok, Primorsky Region, Russian Federation.
Far Eastern Federal University · RUFar Eastern State Technical Fisheries University · RUSt. Petersburg State Medical Academy "City Polyclinic №44" · RUVladivostok State Medical University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the efficacy and safety of solifenacin for correcting the residual symptoms of an overactive bladder (OAB) in patients who were treated for a urinary tract infection (UTI). PATIENTS AND

methodsUsing random sampling, 524 patients aged >60 years were selected (347 women, 66.2%, and 177 men, 33.8%). They denied the presence of any symptoms of detrusor overactivity in their medical history, but had a diagnosis of a UTI. At least 1 month after the end of treatment and a laboratory confirmation of the absence of infection, each patient completed an OAB-Awareness Tool questionnaire (OAB signs, total score 8 points), and a noninvasive examination of urinary function (uroflowmetry). Each day patients in group A took solifenacin 10 mg and those in group B took 5 mg, with patients in group C being given a placebo.

resultsDuring the study 58.8% of patients had symptoms of an OAB at 1 month after the end of the treatment for a UTI, and normal laboratory markers. During treatment with the standard and higher dose of solifenacin, within 8 weeks most variables of the condition of the lower urinary tract reached a normal state or improved.

conclusionPatients aged >60 years who had been treated for a UTI have a high risk of developing symptoms of an OAB. Solifenacin in standard doses is an efficient and safe means of managing overactive detrusor symptoms after a UTI.

Indexed as

Elderly menIE, incontinence episodesLUT, lower urinary tractOAB-AT, OAB Awareness Tool (questionnaire)OAB, overactive bladderOveractive bladderSolifenacinUE, urgency episodesUrinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID26413348
PMCPMC4563008
OpenAlexW1476324162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.