Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26413171›Full record

ArticleGMS Zeitschrift fur medizinische Ausbildung2015

How do Supervising Clinicians of a University Hospital and Associated Teaching Hospitals Rate the Relevance of the Key Competencies within the CanMEDS Roles Framework in Respect to Teaching in Clinical Clerkships?

Stefanie Jilg, Andreas Möltner, Pascal Berberat, Martin R Fischer, Jan Breckwoldt

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in GMS Zeitschrift fur medizinische Ausbildung, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Healthcare Simulation: A Key to the Future of Medical Education - A Review.Advances in medical education and practice · 2022
    Review
  6. [Residency program under scrutiny (part 2)-How do residents prepare for emergency operations?]Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. What understanding of economics do medical students have?GMS journal for medical education · 2019
    Article
  13. SaudiMEDs and CanMEDs frameworks: similarities and differences.Advances in medical education and practice · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stefanie JilgTechnische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, III. Medizinische Klinik für Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, München, Deutschland.
Andreas MöltnerKompetenzzentrum für Prüfungen in der Medizin/Baden-Württemberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Pascal BerberatTechnische Universität München, Fakultät für Medizin, MedizinDidaktisches Centrum für Ausbildungsforschung und Lehre (TUM MeDiCAL), München, Deutschland.
Martin R FischerKlinikum der Universität München, Institut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, München, Deutschland.
Jan BreckwoldtUniversität Zürich, Medizinische Fakultät, Studiendekanat, Zürich, Schweiz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimIn German-speaking countries, the physicians' roles framework of the "Canadian Medical Education Directives for Specialists" (CanMEDS) is increasingly used to conceptualize postgraduate medical education. It is however unclear, whether it may also be applied to the final year of undergraduate education within clinical clerkships, called "Practical Year" (PY). Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore how clinically active physicians at a university hospital and at associated teaching hospitals judge the relevance of the seven CanMEDS roles (and their (role-defining) key competencies) in respect to their clinical work and as learning content for PY training. Furthermore, these physicians were asked whether the key competencies were actually taught during PY training.

methods124 physicians from internal medicine and surgery rated the relevance of the 28 key competencies of the CanMEDS framework using a questionnaire. For each competency, following three aspects were rated: "relevance for your personal daily work", "importance for teaching during PY", and "implementation into actual PY teaching".

resultsIn respect to the main study objective, all questionnaires could be included into analysis. All seven CanMEDS roles were rated as relevant for personal daily work, and also as important for teaching during PY. Furthermore, all roles were stated to be taught during actual PY training. The roles "Communicator", "Medical Expert", and "Collaborator" were rated as significantly more important than the other roles, for all three sub-questions. No differences were found between the two disciplines internal medicine and surgery, nor between the university hospital and associated teaching hospitals.

conclusionParticipating physicians rated all key competencies of the CanMEDS model to be relevant for their personal daily work, and for teaching during PY. These findings support the suitability of the CanMEDS framework as a conceptual element of PY training.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetencePhysician's RoleAdultCanadaClinical ClerkshipCross-Cultural ComparisonCurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateEuropeFemaleHospitals, TeachingHospitals, UniversityHumansMaleMiddle AgedCanMEDS frameworkclinical teachingcompetenciescurriculum planningresidency training

Identifiers

PMID26413171
PMCPMC4580442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.