Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26413168›Full record

ReviewGMS Zeitschrift fur medizinische Ausbildung2015

Is German Medical Education Research on the rise? An analysis of publications from the years 2004 to 2013.

Kristina Ackel-Eisnach, Patricia Raes, Lisa Hönikl, Daniel Bauer, Stefan Wagener, Andreas Möltner, Jana Jünger, Martin R Fischer

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in GMS Zeitschrift fur medizinische Ausbildung, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kristina Ackel-EisnachUniversity of Koblenz-Landau, Faculty 5: Educational Sciences, Campus Landau, Department 1: Empirical Pedagogical Research, Landau, Germany.
Patricia RaesLudwig Maximilian University of Munich, Faculty of Medicine, Office of the Dean, Munich, Germany.
Lisa HöniklLudwig Maximilian University of Munich, Faculty of Medicine, Office of the Dean, Munich, Germany.
Daniel BauerClinic of the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Institute for Medical Education, Munich, Germany.
Stefan WagenerHeidelberg University, Faculty of Medicine, Office of the Dean, Heidelberg, Germany.
Andreas MöltnerHeidelberg University, Internal Medicine II, Heidelberg, Germany ; Heidelberg University, Centre of Competence for Medical Testing Baden-Württemberg - KomP Med, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jana JüngerHeidelberg University, Internal Medicine II, Heidelberg, Germany ; Heidelberg University, Centre of Competence for Medical Testing Baden-Württemberg - KomP Med, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin R FischerClinic of the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Institute for Medical Education, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe point of departure for the present work is the observation that, in comparison with Anglo-American countries or the Netherlands, Germany was responsible for only a marginal number of international publications in the field of medical education research before 2004. Recent years, however, have seen an increase in the importance of medical education research in Germany. The objective of this article is to evaluate the extent to which this trend can be substantiated by increased German publishing activity since the year 2004 in international, English-language journals in the subject area of "medical education research".

methodsIn the framework of a literature and content analysis, German-author articles from the years 2004 to 2013 in six international, English-language medical education research journals were evaluated. In order to obtain an overview of German research activity in this area, all project and original works with German first and last authors were identified and subjected to a more in-depth content analysis.

resultsIn total, 10,055 articles were examined. The evaluation shows that between the years 2004 and 2013 179 articles (of which 145 are project or original works) by German authors were published in the journals examined. Fluctuations over the course of time were evidenced. The project and original works are primarily cross-sectional studies (27.8%) and randomised control studies (25.6%) on the subject of "teaching and learning methods" (43.6%).

conclusionsIn comparison with the years 2004-2008, a significant rise can be seen in the number of publications by German education researchers in international journals since the year 2009.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonEducation, MedicalForecastingGermanyHumansPublicationsResearchcontent analysisinternational publicationliterature analysismedical education research

Identifiers

PMID26413168
PMCPMC4580754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.