Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26413060›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]

Healthcare-associated vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecium infections in the Mansoura University Hospitals intensive care units, Egypt.

Dalia Moemen, Doaa Tawfeek, Wafaa Badawy

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Magnitude of vancomycin-resistantJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. High Gastrointestinal Colonization Rate of Vancomycin-ResistantInternational journal of microbiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Increasing Trend of Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci Bacteremia in a Tertiary Care Hospital of South India: A Three-year Prospective Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The rise in vancomycin-resistantAntimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dalia MoemenDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt .
Doaa TawfeekDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt .
Wafaa BadawyDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt .
Mansoura University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) ia an emerging and challenging nosocomial pathogen. This study aimed to determine the prevalence, risk factors and clonal relationships between different VREF isolates in the intensive care units (ICUs) of the university hospitals in our geographic location. This prospective study was conducted from July, 2012 until September, 2013 on 781 patients who were admitted to the ICUs of the Mansoura University Hospitals (MUHs), and fulfilled the healthcare-associated infection (HAI) criteria. Susceptibility testing was determined using the disk diffusion method. The clonal relationships were evaluated with pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Out of 52 E. faecium isolates, 12 (23.1%) were vancomycin resistant. The significant risk factors for the VREF infections were: transfer to the ICU from a ward, renal failure, an extended ICU stay and use of third-generation cephalosporins, gentamicin, or ciprofloxacin. PFGE with the 12 isolates showed 9 different patterns; 3 belonged to the same pulsotype and another 2 carried a second pulsotypes. The similar pulsotypes isolates were isolated from ICUs of one hospital (EICUs); however, all of the isolates from the other ICUs had different patterns. Infection control policy, in conjunction with antibiotic stewardship, is important to combat VREF transmission in these high-risk patients.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCephalosporinsCiprofloxacinCross InfectionDNA, BacterialEgyptEnterococcus faeciumGentamicinsGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHumansInfection ControlIntensive Care UnitsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsProspective StudiesRenal InsufficiencyRisk FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCephalosporinsCiprofloxacinDNA, BacterialGentamicinsVancomycinEnterococcus faeciumICUPFGErisk factorsvancomycin

Identifiers

PMID26413060
PMCPMC4568866
OpenAlexW2153702022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.