Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26413043›Full record

ReviewBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]

Dormancy models for Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A minireview.

Amani M Alnimr

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Microbiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Tuberculosis: The success tale of less explored dormantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  8. Deletion ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Protein kinase G confers survival advantage toThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Amani M AlnimrKing Fahad Hospital of the University, College of Medicine, University of Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dormancy models for Mycobacterium tuberculosis play important roles in understanding various aspects of tuberculosis pathogenesis and in the testing of novel therapeutic regimens. By simulating the latent tuberculosis infection, in which the bacteria exist in a non-replicative state, the models demonstrate reduced susceptibility to antimycobacterial agents. This minireview outlines the models available for simulating latent tuberculosis both in vitro and in several animal species. Additionally, this minireview discusses the advantages and disadvantages of these models for investigating the bacterial subpopulations and susceptibilities to sterilization by various antituberculosis drugs.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsAntitubercular AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialGuinea PigsIndicators and ReagentsLatent TuberculosisMacaca fascicularisMiceMycobacterium tuberculosisOxazinesRabbitsTuberculosis, PulmonaryXanthenesZebrafishAntitubercular AgentsIndicators and ReagentsOxazinesresazurinXanthenesdormancylatencystationary-phasetuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID26413043
PMCPMC4568887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.