ArticleBioscience2015
Repertoires: How to Transform a Project into a Research Community.
Article in Bioscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lane-Petter's Pipeline: Why reliably decreasing animal research takes more than replacements.European journal for philosophy of science · 2026Article
- A sociological perspective on the challenges of displacing animal research within academia: the contribution of Bourdieu.NAM journal · 2025Article
- Data management challenges for artificial intelligence in plant and agricultural research.F1000Research · 2021Article
- What Is New about the Exposome? Exploring Scientific Change in Contemporary Epidemiology.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- How Does One "Open" Science? Questions of Value in Biological Research.Science, technology & human values · 2017Article
- Human-based approaches to pharmacology and cardiology: an interdisciplinary and intersectorial workshop.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2016Article
- Generations of interdisciplinarity in bioinformatics.New genetics and society · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
How effectively communities of scientists come together and co-operate is crucial both to the quality of research outputs and to the extent to which such outputs integrate insights, data and methods from a variety of fields, laboratories and locations around the globe. This essay focuses on the ensemble of material and social conditions that makes it possible for a short-term collaboration, set up to accomplish a specific task, to give rise to relatively stable communities of researchers. We refer to these distinctive features as
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.