Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26412844›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2015

Incidence and recurrence of boils and abscesses within the first year: a cohort study in UK primary care.

Laura J Shallcross, Andrew C Hayward, Anne M Johnson, Irene Petersen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Staphylococcus aureus Skin and Soft Tissue Infection Recurrence Rates in Outpatients: A Retrospective Database Study at 3 US Medical Centers.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Protective immunity in recurrentProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura J ShallcrossResearch Department of Infection and Population Health.
Andrew C HaywardResearch Department of Infection and Population Health;
Anne M JohnsonResearch Department of Infection and Population Health.
Irene PetersenResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London.
Biology of Infection · FRUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0501879Medical Research Council MR/K006584/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBoils and abscesses are common in primary care but the burden of recurrent infection is unknown.

aimTo investigate the incidence of and risk factors for recurrence of boil or abscess for individuals consulting primary care. DESIGN AND

settingCohort study using electronic health records from primary care in the UK.

methodThe Health Improvement Network (THIN) database was used to identify patients who had consulted their GP for a boil or abscess. Poisson regression was used to examine the relationship between age, sex, social deprivation, and consultation and to calculate the incidence of, and risk factors for, repeat consultation for a boil or abscess.

resultsOverall, 164 461 individuals were identified who consulted their GP for a boil or abscess between 1995 and 2010. The incidence of first consultation for a boil or abscess was 512 (95% CI = 509 to 515) per 100 000 person-years in females and 387 (95% CI = 385 to 390) per 100 000 person-years in males. First consultations were most frequent in younger age groups (16-34 years) and those with the greatest levels of social deprivation. The rate of repeat consultation for a new infection during follow up was 107.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 105.6 to 109.4) per 1000 person-years. Obesity (relative risk [RR] 1.3, 95% CI = 1.2 to 1.3), diabetes (RR 1.3, 95% CI = 1.2 to 1.3), smoking (RR 1.3, 95% CI = 1.2 to 1.4), age <30 years (RR 1.2, 95% CI = 1.2 to 1.3), and prior antibiotic use (RR 1.4, 95% CI = 1.3-1.4) were all associated with repeat consultation for a boil or abscess.

conclusionTen percent of patients with a boil or abscess develop a repeat boil or abscess within 12 months. Obesity, diabetes, young age, smoking, and prescription of an antibiotic in the 6 months before initial presentation were independently associated with recurrent infection, and may represent options for prevention.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareAbscessAdolescentAdultDatabases, FactualFemaleFurunculosisHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedObesityPractice Guidelines as TopicRecurrenceRisk FactorsSmokingabscessboilsepidemiologyprimary carerisk factors

Identifiers

PMID26412844
PMCPMC4582880
OpenAlexW2189013609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.