Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26412840›Full record

Observational studyThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2015

Nursing consultations and control of diabetes in general practice: a retrospective observational study.

Trevor Murrells, Jane Ball, Jill Maben, Mark Ashworth, Peter Griffiths

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Workload impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework for patients with diabetes: an interrupted time series in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Nurse Practitioner Involvement in Medicare Accountable Care Organizations: Association With Quality of Care.American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Trevor MurrellsNational Nursing Research Unit, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, London.
Jane BallNIHR CLAHRC Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton.
Jill MabenNational Nursing Research Unit, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, London.
Mark AshworthDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, London.
Peter GriffithsNIHR CLAHRC Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton.
Florence Nightingale Foundation · GBWessex Institute of Technology · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes affects around 3.6 million people in the UK. Previous research found that general practices employing more nurses delivered better diabetes care, but did not include data on individual patient characteristics or consultations received.

aimTo examine whether the proportion of consultations with patients with diabetes provided by nurses in GP practices is associated with control of diabetes measured by levels of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). DESIGN AND

settingA retrospective observational study using consultation records from 319 649 patients with diabetes from 471 UK general practices from 2002 to 2011.

methodHierarchical multilevel models to examine associations between proportion of consultations undertaken by nurses and attaining HbA1c targets over time, controlling for case-mix and practice level factors.

resultsThe proportion of consultations with nurses has increased by 20% since 2002 but patients with diabetes made fewer consultations per year in 2011 compared with 2002 (11.6 versus 16.0). Glycaemic control has improved and was more uniformly achieved in 2011 than 2002. Practices in which nurses provide a higher proportion of consultations perform no differently to those where nurse input is lower (lowest versus highest nurse contact tertile odds ratio [OR] [confidence interval {95% CI}]: HbA1c ≤53 mmol/mol (7%) 2002, 1.04 [95% CI = 0.87 to 1.25] and 2011, 0.95 [95% CI = 0.87 to 1.03]; HbA1c ≤86 mmol/mol (10%) 2002, 0.97 [95% CI = 0.73 to 1.29] and 2011, 0.95 [95% CI = 0.86 to 1.04]).

conclusionPractices that primarily use GPs to deliver diabetes care could release significant resources with no adverse effect by switching their services towards nurse-led care.

Indexed as

Family Nurse PractitionersGeneral PracticeBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Glycated HemoglobinHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareProgram EvaluationReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesUnited KingdomBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humandiabetes mellitusgeneral practicehealth workforcenursesnursing staffprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID26412840
PMCPMC4582876
OpenAlexW2142892119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.