Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26412381›Full record

ArticleMycopathologia2016

Development and Evaluation of a Novel Real-Time PCR for Pan-Dermatophyte Detection in Nail Specimens.

Jie Gong, Menglong Ran, Xiaowen Wang, Zhe Wan, Ruoyu Li

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycopathologia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Epidemiology and Diagnostic Perspectives of Dermatophytoses.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jie GongDepartment of Dermatology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku St., West District, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China.
Menglong RanDepartment of Dermatology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku St., West District, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China.
Xiaowen WangDepartment of Dermatology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku St., West District, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China.
Zhe WanDepartment of Dermatology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku St., West District, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China.
Ruoyu LiDepartment of Dermatology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku St., West District, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China. lrymm@medmail.com.cn.
Peking University · CNPeking University First Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An accurate diagnosis of tinea unguium is necessary for the selection of antimycotics and successful treatment. To rapidly and accurately identify the aetiological agents causing tinea unguium, we improved upon the conventional boiling method for DNA extraction and developed a novel real-time PCR detection system that includes two assays. The two assays, based on the amplification of ribosomal internal transcribed spacer regions and 28S rDNA, were designed to detect pan-dermatophyte and Trichophyton rubrum, respectively. The analytical sensitivities of both assays permitted the detection of ten copies of plasmid DNA template. The analytical specificity of the detection system was confirmed using 11 dermatophyte strains and 25 non-dermatophyte strains. In total, 165 nail specimens were examined by microscopy, culture, conventional PCR, and the novel real-time PCR method. Real-time PCR gave positive results in 47.3 % of the specimens (78), a rate exceeding those obtained using microscopy (72, 43.6 %), conventional PCR (69, 41.8 %), and culture (49, 29.7 %). All conventional PCR-positive specimens were detected by real-time PCR, and real-time PCR detected nine specimens that were missed by conventional PCR. The results from latent class analysis, and further calculations, showed that real-time PCR was the most sensitive method, but the diagnostic specificity of the four approaches was equivalent. In particular, molecular approaches may be more effective than microscopy and culture when the clinical symptoms of tinea unguium are not evident.

Indexed as

ArthrodermataceaeChinaDNA, FungalDNA, RibosomalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerHospitals, UniversityHumansMicrobiological TechniquesMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNailsOnychomycosisReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 28SSensitivity and SpecificitySpecimen HandlingDNA, FungalDNA, RibosomalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerRNA, Ribosomal, 28SDermatophyte PCRFungal infectionPan-dermatophyteTinea unguium

Identifiers

PMID26412381
OpenAlexW1883958469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.