Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26412244›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2016

Acute stress trajectories 1 year after a breast cancer diagnosis.

Sandra Pérez, Andrea Conchado, Yolanda Andreu, María José Galdón, Etzel Cardeña, Elena Ibáñez, Estrella Durá

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sandra PérezDepartment of Personality, Assessment and Therapeutic Interventions, Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir, Valencia, Spain. mariasandra.perez@ucv.es.
Andrea ConchadoDepartment of Statistics, Applied Operations Research and Quality, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Yolanda AndreuDepartment of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
María José GaldónDepartment of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Etzel CardeñaCERCAP, Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Elena IbáñezDepartment of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Estrella DuráDepartment of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Universitat de València · ESLund University · SEUniversitat Politècnica de València · ESValencia Catholic University Saint Vincent Martyr · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the longitudinal trajectories of acute stress reactions over the course of diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up assessments in a group of non-metastatic breast cancer patients during five different moments of the illness process, and to identify psychological predictors of the trajectories.

methodsThe sample was formed by 102 non-metastatic breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Latent growth mixture models (LGMM) were used to identify latent classes, and we used multinomial logistic regression in a conditional model to examine predictors to differentiate between trajectories.

resultsWe identified four different groups according to their trajectories: (1) a resilient group, (44.5 %); (2) a mild acute stress group, (40.6 %); (3) a delayed-recovery group (11.9 %); and (4) a chronic acute stress group (2.9 %). Moreover, anxious preoccupation showed the strongest significant effects in predicting each class, whereas cognitive avoidance and type C personality had moderate effects for participants in the mild acute stress group.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that the majority of breast cancer patients in our study were resilient, with only a small percentage showing chronic acute stress. Because coping strategies, specifically anxious preoccupation, and not more stable variables played a main role in the prediction of acute stress trajectories, future preventive interventions should center in promoting more adaptive coping strategies in breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedStress Disorders, Traumatic, AcuteTime FactorsAcute stress symptomsBreast cancerCopingSpanish womenTrajectoriesType C personality

Identifiers

PMID26412244
OpenAlexW1802144599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.