Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26412097›Full record

ReviewTrends in cognitive sciences2015

Mental Imagery: Functional Mechanisms and Clinical Applications.

Joel Pearson, Thomas Naselaris, Emily A Holmes, Stephen M Kosslyn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 284 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
284citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

284 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Storytelling increases oxytocin and positive emotions and decreases cortisol and pain in hospitalized children.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

224 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joel PearsonSchool of Psychology, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: joel@pearsonlab.org.
Thomas NaselarisDepartment of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Emily A HolmesMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK; Department for Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stephen M KosslynMinerva Schools at the Keck Graduate Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

Seen and mental images in visual cortexR01EY023384 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HERMES, DORA, NASELARIS, THOMAS P · 2014 to 2025
$3.4M
Medical Research Council MC-A060-5PR50Medical Research Council MC_UP_0901/1NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023384Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT088217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental imagery research has weathered both disbelief of the phenomenon and inherent methodological limitations. Here we review recent behavioral, brain imaging, and clinical research that has reshaped our understanding of mental imagery. Research supports the claim that visual mental imagery is a depictive internal representation that functions like a weak form of perception. Brain imaging work has demonstrated that neural representations of mental and perceptual images resemble one another as early as the primary visual cortex (V1). Activity patterns in V1 encode mental images and perceptual images via a common set of low-level depictive visual features. Recent translational and clinical research reveals the pivotal role that imagery plays in many mental disorders and suggests how clinicians can utilize imagery in treatment.

Indexed as

BrainHumansImaginationMemory, Short-TermPerception

Identifiers

PMID26412097
PMCPMC4595480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.