Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26411991›Full record

ArticleJournal of youth and adolescence2015

A Longitudinal Evaluation of the Positive Action Program in a Low-Income, Racially Diverse, Rural County: Effects on Self-Esteem, School Hassles, Aggression, and Internalizing Symptoms.

Shenyang Guo, Qi Wu, Paul R Smokowski, Martica Bacallao, Caroline B R Evans, Katie L Cotter

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shenyang GuoBrown School of Social Work, Washington University, CB# 1196, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA. s.guo@wustl.edu.
Qi WuSchool of Social Work, University of North Carolina, CB# 3550, 325 Pittsboro St, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. qiwu@email.unc.edu.
Paul R SmokowskiSchool of Social Welfare, University of Kansas, 1545 Lilac Ln, Lawrence, KS, 66045, USA. smokowski@ku.edu.
Martica BacallaoSchool of Social Welfare, University of Kansas, 1545 Lilac Ln, Lawrence, KS, 66045, USA. marticabacallao@gmail.com.
Caroline B R EvansSchool of Social Work, University of North Carolina, CB# 3550, 325 Pittsboro St, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. careyrobertson@gmail.com.
Katie L CotterSchool of Social Work, Arizona State University, 411 N. Central Avenue, Suite 800, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA. katie.cotter@asu.edu.
University of Kansas · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USArizona State University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

North Carolina Rural Academic Center for Excellence in Youth Violence PreventionU01CE001948 · CE · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MARSHALL, STEVEN W · 2010 to 2014
$5.8M
NCIPC CDC HHS 5 U01 CE001948-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positive Action is a school-based program that aims to decrease problem behaviors (e.g., violence, substance use) and increase positive behaviors (e.g., school engagement, academic achievement). Although a number of studies have shown that Positive Action successfully achieves these goals, few studies have evaluated the program's effectiveness in rural schools. Given that rural youth are at an increased risk for risky behaviors (e.g., violence, substance use), this is a critical gap in the existing Positive Action research base. The current study assesses the impact of Positive Action on change rates of self-esteem, school hassles, aggression, and internalizing symptoms in a group (N = 1246, 52% female) of ethnically/racially diverse (27% White, 23% African American, 12% mixed race/other, 8% Latino, 30% as American Indian) middle school youth (age range 9-20) located in two violent, low-income rural counties in North Carolina. One county engaged in Positive Action over the 3-year study window while the other county did not. Following multiple imputation and propensity score analysis, 4 two-level hierarchical linear models were run using each of the outcome measures as dependent variables. The results indicate that the program generates statistically significant beneficial effects for youth from the intervention county on self-esteem scores and school hassles scores. Although the program generates beneficial effects for intervention youth on the change in aggression scores, the finding is not statistically significant. The finding on the change in internalizing scores shows a non-significant detrimental effect: the youth from the comparison county have lower internalizing scores than those from the intervention county. Implications are discussed.

Indexed as

Adolescent HealthChild HealthCultural DiversityPoverty AreasRural HealthSchool Health ServicesAchievementAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAggressionChildChild BehaviorFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleAggressionPositive ActionPropensity score analysisRuralSchool-based interventionsSelf-esteem

Identifiers

PMID26411991
OpenAlexW2173261880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.