Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26411750›Full record

SynthesisClinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)2016

A systematic review of the nutritional consequences of esophagectomy.

Melanie Baker, Vanessa Halliday, Robert N Williams, David J Bowrey

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05074914 (Mechanisms and Treatment of Unintentional Weight Loss After Oesophagectomy With Curative Intent), which is not on this map. Cited by 54 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05074914 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Mechanisms and Treatment of Unintentional Weight Loss After Oesophagectomy With Curative Intent

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity College DublinRan2021 to 2023Enrolled64ConditionsOesophageal CancerArmsoesophagectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. QOLEC2: a randomized controlled trial on nutritional and respiratory counseling after esophagectomy for cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Observational
  10. Clinical predictors of early reflux and symptom severity after esophagectomy: a risk prediction tool.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2026
    Article
  11. Utility and outcomes of routine jejunostomy placement following oesophagectomy.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2026
    Article
  12. Changes in Components of Sarcopenia Diagnostic Criteria Throughout the Surgical Treatment of Oesophagogastric Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Observational
  13. Article
  14. Nutritional aspects and quality of life in gastroesophageal cancer patients that underwent colonic interposition.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2026
    Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melanie BakerDept of Surgery, Leicester Royal Infirmary, LE1 5WW, United Kingdom.
Vanessa HallidaySchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, S1 4DA, United Kingdom.
Robert N WilliamsDept of Surgery, Leicester Royal Infirmary, LE1 5WW, United Kingdom.
David J BowreyDept of Surgery, Leicester Royal Infirmary, LE1 5WW, United Kingdom. Electronic address: djb57@le.ac.uk.
Leicester Royal Infirmary · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0610-22480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsAs improved outcomes after esophagectomy have been observed over the last two decades, the focus on care has shifted to survivorship and quality of life. The aim of this review was to determine changes in nutrition after esophagectomy and to assess the evidence for extended nutrition support.

methodsA search strategy was developed to identify primary research reporting change in nutritional status a minimum of one month after esophagectomy.

resultsChanges in nutritional parameters reported by 18 studies indicated a weight loss of 5-12% at six months postoperatively. More than half of patients lost >10% of body weight at 12 months. One study reported a persistent weight loss of 14% from baseline three years after surgery. Three studies reporting on longer term follow up noted that 27%-95% of patients failed to regain their baseline weight. Changes in dietary intake (three studies) indicated inadequate energy and protein intake up to three years after surgery. Global quality of life scores reported in one study correlated with better weight preservation. There were a high frequency of gastrointestinal symptoms reported in six studies, most notably in the first year after surgery, but persisting up to 19 years. Extended enteral nutrition on a selective basis has been reported in several studies.

conclusionsNutritional status is compromised in the months/years following oesophagectomy and may never return to baseline levels. The causes/consequences of weight loss/impaired nutritional intake require further investigation. The role of extended nutritional support in this population remains unclear.

Indexed as

Enteral NutritionNutritional StatusBody WeightDietEsophagectomyHumansNon-Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicQuality of LifeEnteral nutritionEsophagectomyNutritionNutritional statusWeight

Identifiers

PMID26411750
PMCPMC5410167
OpenAlexW1838161105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.