Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26411565›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2015

The Murray collection of pre-antibiotic era Enterobacteriacae: a unique research resource.

Kate S Baker, Edward Burnett, Hannah McGregor, Ana Deheer-Graham, Christine Boinett, Gemma C Langridge, Alexander M Wailan, Amy K Cain, Nicholas R Thomson, Julie E Russell and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kate S BakerWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, UK.
Edward BurnettNational Collection of Type Cultures, Public Health England, Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 0JG, UK.
Hannah McGregorNational Collection of Type Cultures, Public Health England, Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 0JG, UK.
Ana Deheer-GrahamNational Collection of Type Cultures, Public Health England, Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 0JG, UK.
Christine BoinettWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, UK.
Gemma C LangridgeWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, UK.
Alexander M WailanUniversity of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Amy K CainWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, UK.
Nicholas R ThomsonWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, UK.
Julie E RussellNational Collection of Type Cultures, Public Health England, Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 0JG, UK.
Julian ParkhillWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, UK. parkhill@sanger.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council G1100100Medical Research Council G1100100/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 106690/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of historical isolates inform on the evolution and emergence of important pathogens and phenotypes, including antimicrobial resistance. Crucial to studying antimicrobial resistance are isolates that predate the widespread clinical use of antimicrobials. The Murray collection of several hundred bacterial strains of pre-antibiotic era Enterobacteriaceae is an invaluable resource of historical strains from important pathogen groups. Studies performed on the Collection to date merely exemplify its potential, which will only be realised through the continued effort of many scientific groups. To enable that aim, we announce the public availability of the Murray collection through the National Collection of Type Cultures, and present associated metadata with whole genome sequence data for over half of the strains. Using this information we verify the metadata for the collection with regard to subgroup designations, equivalence groupings and plasmid content. We also present genomic analyses of population structure and determinants of mobilisable antimicrobial resistance to aid strain selection in future studies. This represents an invaluable public resource for the study of these important pathogen groups and the emergence and evolution of antimicrobial resistance.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksEnterobacteriaceaeAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialMetagenomicsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID26411565
PMCPMC4584482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.