Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26411506›Full record

ArticleRapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM2015

Mass spectrometric imaging of brain tissue by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry--How do polyatomic primary beams C₆₀⁺, Ar₂₀₀₀⁺, water-doped Ar₂₀₀₀⁺ and (H₂O)₆₀₀₀⁺ compare?

Irma Berrueta Razo, Sadia née Rabbani Sheraz, Alex Henderson, Nicholas P Lockyer, John C Vickerman

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. (COAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2021
    Article
  8. Successive High-Resolution (HAnalytical chemistry · 2021
    Article
  9. CO2 Cluster Ion Beam, an Alternative Projectile for Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Irma Berrueta RazoManchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Sadia née Rabbani SherazManchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Alex HendersonManchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Nicholas P LockyerManchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
John C VickermanManchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
University of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleTo discover the degree to which water-containing cluster beams increase secondary ion yield and reduce the matrix effect in time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF-SIMS) imaging of biological tissue.

methodsThe positive SIMS ion yields from model compounds, mouse brain lipid extract and mouse brain tissue together with mouse brain images were compared using 20 keV C60(+), Ar2000(+), water-doped Ar2000(+) and pure (H2O)6000(+) primary beams.

resultsWater-containing cluster beams where the beam energy per nucleon (E/nucleon) ≈ 0.2 eV are optimum for enhancing ion yields dependent on protonation. Ion yield enhancements over those observed using Ar2000(+) lie in the range 10 to >100 using the (H2 O)6000 (+) beam, while with water-doped (H2O)Ar2000(+) they lie in the 4 to 10 range. The two water-containing beams appear to be optimum for tissue imaging and show strong evidence of increasing yields from molecules that experience matrix suppression under other primary beams.

conclusionsThe application of water-containing primary beams is suggested for biological SIMS imaging applications, particularly if the beam energy can be raised to 40 keV or higher to further increase ion yield and enhance spatial resolution to ≤1 µm.

Indexed as

Brain ChemistryAnimalsArgonMiceSpectrometry, Mass, Secondary IonArgon

Identifiers

PMID26411506
PMCPMC4989468
OpenAlexW2110171384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.