ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2015
Indirect additive manufacturing as an elegant tool for the production of self-supporting low density gelatin scaffolds.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stable Protein-Based G-Quadruplex-Derived Supramolecular Bioinks as Tunable ECM-Mimetic Constructs Assembled by Combining Non-Covalent and Covalent Strategies.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Indirect 3D printing in tissue engineering: expanding materials used for improved scaffold functionality.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Review
- Review
- A review of bioengineering techniques applied to breast tissue: Mechanical properties, tissue engineering and finite element analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Indirect 3D Bioprinting of a Robust Trilobular Hepatic Construct with Decellularized Liver Matrix Hydrogel.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Gelatin methacryloyl as environment for chondrocytes and cell delivery to superficial cartilage defects.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2022Article
- Biodegradable Inks in Indirect Three-Dimensional Bioprinting for Tissue Vascularization.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Optimized Photoclick (Bio)Resins for Fast Volumetric Bioprinting.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2021Article
- Lightweight 3D bioprinting with point by point photocuring.Bioactive materials · 2021Article
- Applications of 3D printed bone tissue engineering scaffolds in the stem cell field.Regenerative therapy · 2021Review
- Impact of Hydrogel Stiffness on Differentiation of Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cell Microspheroids.Tissue engineering. Part A · 2019Article
- Cross-Linkable Gelatins with Superior Mechanical Properties Through Carboxylic Acid Modification: Increasing the Two-Photon Polymerization Potential.Biomacromolecules · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present work describes for the first time the production of self-supporting low gelatin density (<10 w/v%) porous scaffolds using methacrylamide-modified gelatin as an extracellular matrix mimicking component. As porous scaffolds starting from low gelatin concentrations cannot be realized with the conventional additive manufacturing techniques in the abscence of additives, we applied an indirect fused deposition modelling approach. To realize this, we have printed a sacrificial polyester scaffold which supported the hydrogel material during UV crosslinking, thereby preventing hydrogel structure collapse. After complete curing, the polyester scaffold was selectively dissolved leaving behind a porous, interconnective low density gelatin scaffold. Scaffold structural analysis indicated the success of the selected indirect additive manufacturing approach. Physico-chemical testing revealed scaffold properties (mechanical, degradation, swelling) to depend on the applied gelatin concentration and methacrylamide content. Preliminary biocompatibility studies revealed the cell-interactive and biocompatible properties of the materials developed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.