Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26411308›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2017

Identifying Community Perspectives for a Lung Cancer Screening Awareness Campaign in Appalachia Kentucky: The Terminate Lung Cancer (TLC) Study.

Roberto Cardarelli, Karen L Roper, Kathryn Cardarelli, Frances J Feltner, Shirley Prater, Karen Michelle Ledford, Barbara Justice, David R Reese, Patsy Wagner, Christine Cantrell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Community Awareness of Lung Cancer Screening: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Annals of thoracic surgery short reports · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Training and Dissemination of Lung Cancer Education Curriculum Among Community Health Advisors in the Deep South: a Program Evaluation.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Optimizing the implementation of lung cancer screening in Scotland: Focus group participant perspectives in the LUNGSCOT study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Lung Cancer Screening Utilization.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Implementation of tobacco cessation services at a comprehensive cancer center: a qualitative study of oncology providers' perceptions and practices.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Roberto CardarelliDepartment of Family & Community Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 2195 Harrodsburg Road, Lexington, KY, 40504-3504, USA.
Karen L RoperDepartment of Family & Community Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 2195 Harrodsburg Road, Lexington, KY, 40504-3504, USA. karen.roper@uky.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7281-1713
Kathryn CardarelliUniversity of Kentucky College of Public Health, 111 Washington Ave, Suite 120, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA.
Frances J FeltnerUniversity of Kentucky Center of Excellence in Rural Health & Kentucky Homeplace, 750 Morton Blvd., Hazard, KY, 41701, USA.
Shirley PraterUniversity of Kentucky Center of Excellence in Rural Health & Kentucky Homeplace, 750 Morton Blvd., Hazard, KY, 41701, USA.
Karen Michelle LedfordUniversity of Kentucky Center of Excellence in Rural Health & Kentucky Homeplace, 750 Morton Blvd., Hazard, KY, 41701, USA.
Barbara JusticeUniversity of Kentucky Center of Excellence in Rural Health & Kentucky Homeplace, 750 Morton Blvd., Hazard, KY, 41701, USA.
David R ReeseAppalachian Osteopathic Postgraduate Training Institute Consortium, 147 Sycamore Street, Pikeville, KY, 41501, USA.
Patsy Wagner, Pikeville, KY, 41501, USA.
Christine Cantrell, Ezel, KY, 41425, USA.

Funding

University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center Support Grant ECIA SupplementP30CA177558 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Jennifer F Rogers · 2013 to 2026
$38.3M
Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR000117 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KERN, PHILIP A · 2012 to 2015
$13.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000117NCI NIH HHS P30 CA177558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scan is now covered by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services following an evidence-based recommendation, but a shared decision making process should inform patients of risks and limitations. An awareness campaign promoting LDCT screenings is an opportunity to elicit patient engagement with health providers about the risks and benefits. Focus groups representing three regions of Appalachian Kentucky known for high lung cancer rates discussed development of a lung cancer screening campaign. Recommendations included messaging content, appeals or design, campaign implementation, and trusted information or communication sources. Community health workers (CHWs) from three Eastern Kentucky regions recruited individuals from their local communities using established client files. CHWs hosted six total focus groups (7-11 participants each) using questions guided by the Communication-Persuasion Matrix framework. All sessions were recorded and transcribed for independent content analysis. A total of 54 individuals (61.1 % female; >55 pack year history) were participated. Prior to discussion, most participants had not heard of lung cancer screening. Cited needs for content of a campaign included benefits of early detection and payment information. Messages considered most persuasive were those that include personal testimony, messages of hope, prolonged life, and an emphasis on family and the ambition to survive. Having information come from one's family doctor or specialty provider was considered important to message communication. Messages about survivorship, family, and prolonged life should be considered in lung cancer screening awareness campaigns. Our results provide community input about messages regarding screening options.

Indexed as

AwarenessCommunity Health WorkersAgedAppalachian RegionEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFocus GroupsHumansKentuckyLung NeoplasmsMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedTomography, X-Ray ComputedAppalachiaFocus GroupsLung cancerPreventionQualitativeScreening

Identifiers

PMID26411308
PMCPMC5569580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.