ReviewAoB PLANTS2015
Plant cooperation.
Review in AoB PLANTS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Testing for completions that simulate altruism in early language models.Nature human behaviour · 2025Article
- Article
- Kin discrimination causes plastic responses in floral and clonal allocation.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Indirect genetic effects are shaped by demographic history and ecology in Arabidopsis thaliana.Nature ecology & evolution · 2023Article
- Changes in the Amount and Distribution of Soil Nutrients and Neighbours Have Differential Impacts on Root and Shoot Architecture in Wheat (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Kin Recognition in an Herbicide-Resistant Barnyardgrass (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The evolution of cooperation in the unidirectional linear division of labour of finite roles.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- Increasing plant group productivity through latent genetic variation for cooperation.PLoS biology · 2022Article
- Evolution of prudent predation in complex food webs.Ecology letters · 2022Article
- Biomass allocation in response to accession recognition inPlant signaling & behavior · 2021Article
- Plant sexual reproduction: perhaps the current plant two-sex model should be replaced with three- and four-sex models?Plant reproduction · 2021Article
- Detect thy family: Mechanisms, ecology and agricultural aspects of kin recognition in plants.Plant, cell & environment · 2021Review
- Intraspecific competition for host resources in a parasite.Current biology : CB · 2021Article
- The Genomic Architecture of Competitive Response ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Breeding Beyond Monoculture: Putting the "Intercrop" Into Crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Review
- Plants are intelligent, here's how.Annals of botany · 2020Article
- Family quarrels in seeds and rapid adaptive evolution inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Kin discrimination allows plants to modify investment towards pollinator attraction.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Kin selection and the evolution of plant reproductive traits.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study of plant behaviour will be aided by conceptual approaches and terminology for cooperation, altruism and helping. The plant literature has a rich discussion of helping between species while the animal literature has an extensive and somewhat contentious discussion of within-species helping. Here, I identify and synthesize concepts, terminology and some practical methodology for speaking about helping in plant populations and measuring the costs and benefits. I use Lehmann and Keller's (2006) classification scheme for animal helping and McIntire and Fajardo's (2014) synthesis of facilitation to provide starting points for classifying the mechanisms of how and why organisms help each other. Contextual theory is discussed as a mechanism for understanding and measuring the fitness consequences of helping. I synthesize helping into four categories. The act of helping can be costly to the helper. If the helper gains indirect fitness by helping relatives but loses direct fitness, this is altruism, and it only occurs within species. Helpers can exchange costly help, which is called mutualism when between species, and reciprocation when within a species. The act of helping can directly benefit the helper as well as the recipient, either as an epiphenomenon resulting from behaviours under natural selection for other reasons, or because the helper is creating a mutual benefit, such as satiating predators or supporting a mutualism. Facilitation between species by stress amelioration, creation of novel ecosystems and habitat complexity often meets the definition of epiphenomenon helping. Within species, this kind of helping is called by-product mutualism. If the helping is under selection to create a mutual benefit shared by others, between species this is facilitation with service sharing or access to resources and within species, direct benefits by mutual benefits. These classifications provide a clear starting point for addressing the subject of helping behaviours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.