ReviewJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2015
Respiratory nanoparticle-based vaccines and challenges associated with animal models and translation.
Review in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in Targeted Engineered Nanoparticle-Based Therapeutics for Respiratory Diseases: Current Insights and Future Perspectives.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Nasal Delivery to the Brain: Harnessing Nanoparticles for Effective Drug Transport.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Lipid-Based Nanotechnology: Liposome.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Potential of Nanotechnology-based Formulations in Combating Pulmonary Infectious Diseases: A Current Scenario.Current pharmaceutical design · 2022Review
- Brief on Recent Application of Liposomal Vaccines for Lower Respiratory Tract Viral Infections: From Influenza to COVID-19 Vaccines.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Revolutionizing polymer-based nanoparticle-linked vaccines for targeting respiratory viruses: A perspective.Life sciences · 2021Review
- Application of nanotechnology in drug delivery systems for respiratory diseases (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2021Review
- Nanoparticle-based vaccine development and evaluation against viral infections in pigs.Veterinary research · 2019Review
- Utility of the Neonatal Calf Model for Testing Vaccines and Intervention Strategies for Use against Human RSV Infection.Vaccines · 2019Review
- A review of metabolomics approaches and their application in identifying causal pathways of childhood asthma.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2018Review
- Room Temperature Stable PspA-Based Nanovaccine Induces Protective Immunity.Frontiers in immunology · 2018Article
- Article
- Mucosal vaccine delivery: Current state and a pediatric perspective.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Vaccine development has had a huge impact on human health. However, there is a significant need to develop efficacious vaccines for several existing as well as emerging respiratory infectious diseases. Several challenges need to be overcome to develop efficacious vaccines with translational potential. This review focuses on two aspects to overcome some barriers - 1) the development of nanoparticle-based vaccines, and 2) the choice of suitable animal models for respiratory infectious diseases that will allow for translation. Nanoparticle-based vaccines, including subunit vaccines involving synthetic and/or natural polymeric adjuvants and carriers, as well as those based on virus-like particles offer several key advantages to help overcome the barriers to effective vaccine development. These include the ability to deliver combinations of antigens, target the vaccine formulation to specific immune cells, enable cross-protection against divergent strains, act as adjuvants or immunomodulators, allow for sustained release of antigen, enable single dose delivery, and potentially obviate the cold chain. While mouse models have provided several important insights into the mechanisms of infectious diseases, they are often a limiting step in translation of new vaccines to the clinic. An overview of different animal models involved in vaccine research for respiratory infections, with advantages and disadvantages of each model, is discussed. Taken together, advances in nanotechnology, combined with the right animal models for evaluating vaccine efficacy, has the potential to revolutionize vaccine development for respiratory infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.