Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26410032›Full record

ArticleOecologia2016

Burrowing seabird effects on invertebrate communities in soil and litter are dominated by ecosystem engineering rather than nutrient addition.

Kate H Orwin, David A Wardle, David R Towns, Mark G St John, Peter J Bellingham, Chris Jones, Brian M Fitzgerald, Richard G Parrish, Phil O'B Lyver

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Harnessing island-ocean connections to maximize marine benefits of island conservation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kate H OrwinLandcare Research, PO Box 69040, Lincoln, 7640, New Zealand. kateorwin@hotmail.com.
David A WardleDepartment of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 901-83, Umeå, Sweden.
David R TownsDepartment of Conservation, Newton, PO Box 68 908, Auckland, 1145, New Zealand.
Mark G St JohnLandcare Research, PO Box 69040, Lincoln, 7640, New Zealand.
Peter J BellinghamLandcare Research, PO Box 69040, Lincoln, 7640, New Zealand.
Chris JonesLandcare Research, PO Box 69040, Lincoln, 7640, New Zealand.
Brian M FitzgeraldDepartment of Entomology, Te Papa Tongarewa Museum of New Zealand, Wellington, 6140, New Zealand.
Richard G Parrish15 Willowbrook, Pukekohe, 2120, New Zealand.
Phil O'B LyverLandcare Research, PO Box 69040, Lincoln, 7640, New Zealand.
Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research · NZAuckland University of Technology · NZMuseum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa · NZSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertebrate consumers can be important drivers of the structure and functioning of ecosystems, including the soil and litter invertebrate communities that drive many ecosystem processes. Burrowing seabirds, as prevalent vertebrate consumers, have the potential to impact consumptive effects via adding marine nutrients to soil (i.e. resource subsidies) and non-consumptive effects via soil disturbance associated with excavating burrows (i.e. ecosystem engineering). However, the exact mechanisms by which they influence invertebrates are poorly understood. We examined how soil chemistry and plant and invertebrate communities changed across a gradient of seabird burrow density on two islands in northern New Zealand. Increasing seabird burrow density was associated with increased soil nutrient availability and changes in plant community structure and the abundance of nearly all the measured invertebrate groups. Increasing seabird densities had a negative effect on invertebrates that were strongly influenced by soil-surface litter, a positive effect on fungal-feeding invertebrates, and variable effects on invertebrate groups with diverse feeding strategies. Gastropoda and Araneae species richness and composition were also influenced by seabird activity. Generalized multilevel path analysis revealed that invertebrate responses were strongly driven by seabird engineering effects, via increased soil disturbance, reduced soil-surface litter, and changes in trophic interactions. Almost no significant effects of resource subsidies were detected. Our results show that seabirds, and in particular their non-consumptive effects, were significant drivers of invertebrate food web structure. Reductions in seabird populations, due to predation and human activity, may therefore have far-reaching consequences for the functioning of these ecosystems.

Indexed as

BirdsEcosystemFeeding BehaviorInvertebratesPlantsPredatory BehaviorAnimalsFood ChainIslandsNew ZealandPopulation DynamicsSoilSoilConsumptiveFood websGeneralized multilevel path modelsNon-consumptiveResource subsidy

Identifiers

PMID26410032
OpenAlexW2264164330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.