Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26409887›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2016

Incident users of antipsychotics: who are they and how do they fare?

Lone Baandrup, Marie Kruse

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lone BaandrupCenter for Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research and Center for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, Mental Health Center Glostrup, Copenhagen University Hospital, Nordre Ringvej 29-67, 2600, Glostrup, Denmark. lone.baandrup@regionh.dk.
Marie KruseCenter for Health Economics Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230, Odense, Denmark.
Glostrup Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn Denmark, as well as in many other countries, consumption of antipsychotics is on the rise, partly due to increasing off-label use. The aim of this study was to analyze and quantify the extent of off-label use and polypharmacy in incident users of antipsychotic medication, and to examine initial antipsychotic prescribing patterns and associated use of mental health care services.

methodPopulation-based cohort study linking the following Danish national registers: the Central Psychiatric Research Register, the Register of Medicinal Product Statistics, and Statistics Denmark.

resultsFrom 2007 to 2012, 154,351 Danish subjects initiated treatment with antipsychotics. Among these, 71,254 (46 %) subjects had a psychiatric diagnosis recorded. The most frequent diagnoses were reaction to severe stress and adjustment disorders (10,106; 14 %), depressive episode (8876; 12 %), and recurrent depressive disorder (6810; 10 %). We found high antipsychotic discontinuation rates during the first few months (45 % in 4 months) and frequent antidepressant co-prescribing from treatment onset (47 %). Significantly greater likelihood of psychiatric hospitalization was observed for antipsychotic polypharmacy (HR 1.38; 95 % CI 1.32-1.45), whereas antipsychotic discontinuation was associated with decreased hospitalization risk in most off-label conditions.

conclusionsThe brief duration of most antipsychotic prescriptions suggests that antipsychotics are prescribed more liberally than recommended. As a consequence of the range of adverse effects associated with antipsychotic drug use, the documented widespread off-label prescribing practices warrant careful monitoring for adverse effects and prompt discontinuation in case of an unfavorable risk-benefit ratio.

Indexed as

PolypharmacyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntipsychotic AgentsCohort StudiesDenmarkFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMental DisordersMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedOff-Label UsePractice Patterns, Physicians'Antipsychotic AgentsAntipsychoticsOff-labelPrescribing practiceRegister-based

Identifiers

PMID26409887
OpenAlexW2148263461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.