ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2016
Incident users of antipsychotics: who are they and how do they fare?
Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Minor tranquillizers for short-term treatment of newly onset symptoms of anxiety and distress: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized trials.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2024Pooled it
- Prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.BMC geriatrics · 2022Pooled it
- Use of antipsychotics in Denmark 1997-2018: a nation-wide drug utilisation study with focus on off-label use and associated diagnoses.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2021Article
- Real-world data on new users of atypical antipsychotics: characterisation, prescription patterns, healthcare costs and early cardio-metabolic occurrences from a large Italian database.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020Article
- Trends in utilization and dosing of antipsychotic drugs in Scandinavia: Comparison of 2006 and 2016.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn Denmark, as well as in many other countries, consumption of antipsychotics is on the rise, partly due to increasing off-label use. The aim of this study was to analyze and quantify the extent of off-label use and polypharmacy in incident users of antipsychotic medication, and to examine initial antipsychotic prescribing patterns and associated use of mental health care services.
methodPopulation-based cohort study linking the following Danish national registers: the Central Psychiatric Research Register, the Register of Medicinal Product Statistics, and Statistics Denmark.
resultsFrom 2007 to 2012, 154,351 Danish subjects initiated treatment with antipsychotics. Among these, 71,254 (46 %) subjects had a psychiatric diagnosis recorded. The most frequent diagnoses were reaction to severe stress and adjustment disorders (10,106; 14 %), depressive episode (8876; 12 %), and recurrent depressive disorder (6810; 10 %). We found high antipsychotic discontinuation rates during the first few months (45 % in 4 months) and frequent antidepressant co-prescribing from treatment onset (47 %). Significantly greater likelihood of psychiatric hospitalization was observed for antipsychotic polypharmacy (HR 1.38; 95 % CI 1.32-1.45), whereas antipsychotic discontinuation was associated with decreased hospitalization risk in most off-label conditions.
conclusionsThe brief duration of most antipsychotic prescriptions suggests that antipsychotics are prescribed more liberally than recommended. As a consequence of the range of adverse effects associated with antipsychotic drug use, the documented widespread off-label prescribing practices warrant careful monitoring for adverse effects and prompt discontinuation in case of an unfavorable risk-benefit ratio.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.