GuidelineAnnals of Saudi medicine
National Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Saudi Arabia with strength of recommendations and quality of evidence.
Guideline in Annals of Saudi medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic review of shared decision-making in guidelines about colorectal cancer screening.European journal of cancer care · 2022Pooled it
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines Are Primarily Based on Low-Moderate-Quality Evidence.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2021Pooled it
- Systematic review of colorectal cancer screening guidelines for average-risk adults: Summarizing the current global recommendations.World journal of gastroenterology · 2018Pooled it
- Intensive follow-up for women with breast cancer: review of clinical, economic and patient's preference domains through evidence to decision framework.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2017Pooled it
- Relationship between Serum Vitamin D and Calcium Levels and Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms in Colorectal Cancer.BioMed research international · 2019Trial
- Awareness of colorectal cancer and screening uptake in Eastern KSA: Predictors and implications.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2026Article
- Cancer screening utilization among insured beneficiaries in Saudi Arabia, 2023-2024: a national analysis of trends, calendar variation, and distribution across breast, cervical, and colorectal screening programs.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Colorectal Cancer Screening in Saudi Arabia:Saudi medical journal · 2026Review
- Barriers to colorectal cancer screening tests among adults in the Saudi population: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2025Review
- A chain is only as strong as its weakest link: Care pathways in colorectal cancer, from emergency interventions to preventive strategies.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2025Article
- Assessment of Knowledge and Barriers to Colon Cancer Screening Among the General Public in the Qassim Region.Cureus · 2025Article
- Evaluating the implementation of colorectal cancer screening practices at King Abdul-Aziz Medical City, Riyadh.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- Trends and Gaps in Colorectal Cancer Screening Research in the Arab World: A 16-Year Bibliometric Analysis (2007-2023).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Review
- Exploring barriers to colorectal cancer screening in Saudi Arabia: findings from a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Time trends in colorectal cancer incidence across the BRICS: an age-period-cohort analysis for the GBD 2021.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Colorectal Cancer Screening: Providers' Perspective.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Article
- Review
- Demographic and clinical characteristics associated with advanced stage colorectal cancer: a registry-based cohort study in Saudi Arabia.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Insights into Colorectal Cancer Screening Awareness: A Study in the Community of Taif City.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Article
- Prevalence of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms Among Patients With Cancer in Najran, Saudi Arabia.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer is the most common cancer among Saudi men and the third commonest among Saudi women. Given the predominance of colorectal cancer compared with other cancers in Saudi Arabia, context-specific guidelines are needed for screening.
methodsExperts from the Saudi Society of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Saudi Gastroenterology Association, Saudi Oncology Society, Saudi Chapter of Enterostomal Therapy, Family Medicine and Department of Public Health at the Saudi Arabian Ministry of Health and a patient advocate was assembled by the Saudi Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare, a subsidiary of the Saudi Arabian Ministry of Health. The panel collaborated with a methodological team from McMaster University, Canada to develop national guidelines for colorectal cancer screening. After identifying key questions, the panel conducted a systematic review of all reports on the utility of screening, the cost of screening for colorectal cancer in Saudi Arabia and on the values and preferences of Saudi patients. Meta- analyses, when appropriate, were performed to generate pooled estimates of effect. Using the GRADE approach, the panel used the evidence-to-decision (EtD) framework to assess all domains important in determining the strength and direction of the recommendations (benefits and harms, values and preferences, resource implications, equity, acceptability, and feasibility). Judgments related to the EtD domains were resolved through consensus or voting, if consensus was not reached. The final recommendations were developed during a two-day meeting held in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia in March 2015. Conflicts of interests among the panel members were handled according to the World Health Organization rules. LIMITATIONS: There is lack of national data on the incidence of adenomatous polyps or the age groups in which the incidence surges. There were no national clinical trials assessing the effectiveness of the different modalities of screening for colorectal cancer and their impact on mortality.
conclusionThe panel recommends screening for colorectal cancer in Saudi Arabia in asymptomatic Saudi patients at average risk of colorectal cancer. An infrastructure should be built to achieve that goal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.