Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26409256›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of dermatology2016

Validation of the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale: a patient-reported outcome measure of vitiligo treatment success.

J M Batchelor, W Tan, S Tour, A Yong, A A Montgomery, K S Thomas

Abstract readEvaluation StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of dermatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Development of a core outcome domain set for clinical research on capillary malformations (the COSCAM project).Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J M BatchelorCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, King's Meadow Campus, Lenton Lane, Nottingham, NG7 2NR, U.K.
W TanNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, Queen's Medical Centre, C Floor, South Block, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, U.K.
S TourCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, King's Meadow Campus, Lenton Lane, Nottingham, NG7 2NR, U.K.
A YongNorfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, NR4 7UY, U.K.
A A MontgomeryNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, Queen's Medical Centre, C Floor, South Block, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, U.K.
K S ThomasCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, King's Meadow Campus, Lenton Lane, Nottingham, NG7 2NR, U.K.

Funding

Department of Health HTA/12/24/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-reported outcome measures are rarely used in vitiligo trials. The Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS) is a new patient-reported outcome measure assessing how 'noticeable' vitiligo patches are after treatment. The noticeability of vitiligo after treatment is an important indicator of treatment success from the patient's perspective.

objectivesTo evaluate the construct validity, acceptability and interpretability of the VNS.

methodsClinicians (n = 33) and patients with vitiligo (n = 101) examined 39 image pairs, each depicting a vitiligo lesion pre- and post-treatment. Using an online questionnaire, respondents gave a global assessment of treatment success and a VNS score for treatment response. Clinicians also estimated percentage repigmentation of lesions (< 25%; 25-50%; 51-75%; > 75%). Treatment success was defined as 'yes' on global assessment, a VNS score of 4 or 5, and > 75% repigmentation. Agreement between respondents and the different scales was assessed using kappa (κ) statistics.

resultsVitiligo Noticeability Scale scores were associated with both patient- and clinician-reported global treatment success (κ = 0·54 and κ = 0·47, respectively). Percentage repigmentation showed a weaker association with patient- and clinician-reported global treatment success (κ = 0·39 and κ = 0·29, respectively). VNS scores of 4 or 5 can be interpreted as representing treatment success. Images depicting post-treatment hyperpigmentation were less likely to be rated as successful.

conclusionsThe VNS is a valid patient-reported measure of vitiligo treatment success. Further validation of the VNS is required, using larger sets of clinical pre- and post-treatment images, affecting a wider range of anatomical sites.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SatisfactionAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeVitiligo

Identifiers

PMID26409256
PMCPMC5019146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.