Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26409016›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2015

Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development.

A J M W Vervoort, L B Uittenbogaard, W J K Hehenkamp, H A M Brölmann, B W J Mol, J A F Huirne

8 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 8 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 90 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03518385 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Does the Presence of Intracavitary Fluid During Hormonal Stimulation for IVF Depends on the Position of C-section-scar?

TypeobservationalSponsorART Fertility Clinics LLCRan2018 to 2019Enrolled104ConditionsFluid UterusArmsultrasound,transvaginal scan
NCT03787381 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Factors Influencing the Development of Uterine Niche After Cesarean Delivery

TypeinterventionalSponsorSheba Medical CenterRan2019 to 2022Enrolled282ConditionsUterine Scar From Previous Cesarean Delivery (Diagnosis)ArmsUltrasound
NCT03851003 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

The Influence of Endometrial Suturing During Cesarean Section on the Risk to Develop Uterine Scar Defect: A Randomized Control Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSheba Medical CenterRan2019 to 2022Enrolled130ConditionsCesarean Wound DisruptionArmsEndometrial suturing, Non- endometrial suturing, Vaginal ultrasonography, Questionnaire
NCT03859258 completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Controlled Ultrasound Based Study For Niche Development In The Uterine Cesarean Section Scar With Hysteroscopic Correlation In Symptomatizing Patients

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorCairo UniversityRan2017 to 2019Enrolled221ConditionsCesarean Section, DehiscenceArmsTransvaginal sonography
NCT04241107 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Laparoscopic Versus Transvaginal Approaches in Repair of Uterine Niche: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled50ConditionsUterine NicheArmsLaparoscopic repair of Uterine niche, Transvaginal repair of Uterine niche
NCT04747418 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Uterine Inflammatory Characteristics Following Cesarean Delivery

TypeobservationalSponsorSheba Medical CenterRan2021 to 2025Enrolled163ConditionsCesarean Section Complications, Fertility DisordersArmsDiagnostic Hysteroscopy, Trans-vaginal ultrasound
NCT06503627 phase2 / phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Incidence of Caesarean Scar Defect in Cases of Cesarean Section With and Without Bladder Flap Dissection

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlexandria UniversityRan2022 to 2024Enrolled250ConditionsCS Scar Defect(Niche) How to AvoidArmsbladder flap dissection
NCT06620432 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

High Segmental Hysterotomy vs. Low Segmental Hysterotomy: Association With the Incidence of Uterine Wall Defects After Cesarean Section

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundacion Clinica Valle del LiliRan2025 to 2027Enrolled168ConditionsPlacenta Accreta SpectrumArmsLow segment hysterotomy, High segment hysterotomy, Crossed hysterorrhaphy, Non-Crossed hysterorrhaphy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 238 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Predicting bladder-to-uterine adhesions in patients undergoing hysterectomy using sliding-bladder sign technique with preoperative ultrasound: a diagnostic accuracy study.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A J M W VervoortVU University medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands aj.vervoort@vumc.nl.
L B UittenbogaardVU University medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
W J K HehenkampVU University medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
H A M BrölmannVU University medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
B W J MolVU University medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J A F HuirneVU University medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caesarean section (CS) results in the occurrence of the phenomenon 'niche'. A 'niche' describes the presence of a hypoechoic area within the myometrium of the lower uterine segment, reflecting a discontinuation of the myometrium at the site of a previous CS. Using gel or saline instillation sonohysterography, a niche is identified in the scar in more than half of the women who had had a CS, most with the uterus closed in one single layer, without closure of the peritoneum. An incompletely healed scar is a long-term complication of the CS and is associated with more gynaecological symptoms than is commonly acknowledged. Approximately 30% of women with a niche report spotting at 6-12 months after their CS. Other reported symptoms in women with a niche are dysmenorrhoea, chronic pelvic pain and dyspareunia. Given the association between a niche and gynaecological symptoms, obstetric complications and potentially with subfertility, it is important to elucidate the aetiology of niche development after CS in order to develop preventive strategies. Based on current published data and our observations during sonographic, hysteroscopic and laparoscopic evaluations of niches we postulate some hypotheses on niche development. Possible factors that could play a role in niche development include a very low incision through cervical tissue, inadequate suturing technique during closure of the uterine scar, surgical interventions that increase adhesion formation or patient-related factors that impair wound healing or increase inflammation or adhesion formation.

Indexed as

AdultCesarean SectionCicatrixDysmenorrheaFemaleHumansMetrorrhagiaMyometriumPelvic PainPregnancyUterusWound Healingabnormal uterine bleedingadhesion formationCaesarean sectioncervixnichescarspottingsurgical techniquesuterus

Identifiers

PMID26409016
PMCPMC4643529
OpenAlexW2180573652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

and 2 more above

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.