ArticleNeuroscience2015
Functional role of induced gamma oscillatory responses in processing noxious and innocuous sensory events in humans.
Article in Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- EEG oscillations reveal neuroplastic changes in pain processing associated with long-term meditation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Decoding pain's neural rhythm: Gamma oscillation mechanisms, therapeutic modulation, and translational challenges in pain management.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
- Psychophysical pain encoding in the cingulate cortex predicts responsiveness of electrical stimulation.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Characterization of spatiotemporal dynamics of binary and graded tonic pain in humans using intracranial recordings.PloS one · 2023Article
- In search of a composite biomarker for chronic pain by way of EEG and machine learning: where do we currently stand?Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- Behavioral, Physiological and EEG Activities Associated with Conditioned Fear as Sensors for Fear and Anxiety.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Electrocorticographic changes in field potentials following natural somatosensory percepts in humans.Experimental brain research · 2019Article
- Altered neural oscillations within and between sensorimotor cortex and parietal cortex in chronic jaw pain.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2019Article
- Discrete Modules and Mesoscale Functional Circuits for Thermal Nociception within Primate S1 Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018Article
- Elevated Resting State Gamma Oscillatory Activities in Electroencephalogram of Patients With Post-herpetic Neuralgia.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
- Oscillatory EEG activity induced by conditioning stimuli during fear conditioning reflects Salience and Valence of these stimuli more than Expectancy.Neuroscience · 2017Article
- Enhanced Gamma Oscillatory Activity in Rats with Chronic Inflammatory Pain.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Gamma time-frequency responses (TFRs) induced by painful laser in the contralateral primary somatosensory (SI) cortex have been shown to correlate with perceived pain-intensity in human. Given the functional roles of gamma TFRs in the cortical spaces, it remains unclear whether such a relationship is sustained for other brain regions where the laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) are presented. In this study, we delivered the painful laser pluses at random pain-intensity levels (i.e. strong, medium and weak) in a single train to the dorsal hand of six patients with uncontrolled epilepsy. The laser stimulus produced a painful pinprick sensation by activating nociceptors located in the superficial layers of the skin. For each patient, arrays of >64 subdural electrodes were implanted directly covering the contralateral SI, parasylvian (PS) and medial frontal (MF) cortices to study the stimulus related gamma (TFRs) in the neocortex. In addition, using the same stimulation paradigm, the modality specificity of gamma TFRs was further examined by applying innocuous vibrotactile stimuli to the same regions of the dorsal hand in a separated group of five patients. Our results showed that gamma TFRs are not modality specific, but the largest gamma TFRs were consistently found within the SI region and noxious laser elicited significantly stronger gamma TFRs than innocuous nonpainful vibratory stimuli. Furthermore, stronger pain induced stronger gamma TFRs in the cortices of SI (r=0.4, p<0.001) and PS (r=0.29, p=0.005). Given that potentially harmful noxious stimulus would automatically capture greater attention than the innocuous ones, our results support the hypothesis that the degree of SI and PS gamma TFRs is associated with an attentional drive provoked by painful stimuli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.