Trial reportJAMA neurology2015
Mapping the "Depression Switch" During Intraoperative Testing of Subcallosal Cingulate Deep Brain Stimulation.
Trial report in JAMA neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
70 citing papers in PubMed, 138 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prefrontal-bed nucleus of the stria terminalis physiological and neuropsychological biomarkers predict therapeutic outcomes in depression.Nature communications · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Individualized precision targeting of dorsal attention and default mode networks with rTMS in traumatic brain injury-associated depression.Scientific reports · 2023Trial
- Deep Brain Stimulation for Depression Informed by Intracranial Recordings.Biological psychiatry · 2022Trial
- A unified connectomic target for deep brain stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder.Nature communications · 2020Trial
- Field potential 1/Journal of neurophysiology · 2019Trial
- Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Resting-State Network Targeting for Treatment-Resistant Depression in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blinded Pilot Study.Journal of neurotrauma · 2019Trial
- Subgenual anterior cingulate cortex controls sadness-induced modulations of cognitive and emotional network hubs.Scientific reports · 2018Trial
- Brain network correlates of fatigue, depression, and anxiety in patients with Crohn's Disease in different disease states.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Dopamine and serotonin transients predict depressive symptom relief following deep brain stimulation of human subcallosal cingulate cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Ephaptic coupling and power fluctuations in depression.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- From adaptive deep brain stimulation to adaptive circuit targeting.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2025Review
- Prefrontal Network Mechanisms of Psychiatric Deep Brain Stimulation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Review
- Neural Interoceptive Processing Is Modulated by Deep Brain Stimulation to Subcallosal Cingulate Cortex for Treatment-Resistant Depression.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2025Article
- Dye-Based Fluorescent Organic Nanoparticles, New Promising Tools for Optogenetics.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
- Brain-computer interfaces for neuropsychiatric disorders.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2024Article
- Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation evokes two distinct cortical responses via differential white matter activation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Deep brain stimulation for refractory major depressive disorder: a comprehensive review.Molecular psychiatry · 2024Review
- Opportunities and challenges for the use of deep brain stimulation in the treatment of refractory major depression.Discover mental health · 2024Review
- Whole brain network effects of subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.Molecular psychiatry · 2024Article
10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importanceThe clinical utility of monitoring behavioral changes during intraoperative testing of subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation is unknown.
objectiveTo characterize the structural connectivity correlates of deep brain stimulation-evoked behavioral effects using probabilistic tractography in depression. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsCategorization of acute behavioral effects was conducted in 9 adults undergoing deep brain stimulation implantation surgery for chronic treatment-resistant depression in a randomized and blinded testing session at Emory University. Patients were studied from September 1, 2011, through June 30, 2013. Post hoc analyses of the structural tractography patterns mediating distinct categories of evoked behavioral effects were defined, including the best response overall. Data analyses were performed from May 1 through July 1, 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Categorization of stimulation-induced transient behavioral effects and delineation of the shared white matter tracts mediating response subtypes.
resultsAmong the 9 patients, 72 active and 36 sham trials were recorded. The following stereotypical behavior patterns were identified: changes in interoceptive (noted changes in body state in 30 of 72 active and 4 of 36 sham trials) and in exteroceptive (shift in attention from patient to others in 9 of 72 active and 0 sham trials) awareness. The best response was a combination of exteroceptive and interoceptive changes at a single left contact for all 9 patients. Structural connectivity showed that the best response contacts had a pattern of connections to the bilateral ventromedial frontal cortex (via forceps minor and left uncinate fasciculus) and to the cingulate cortex (via left cingulum bundle), whereas behaviorally salient but nonbest contacts had only cingulate involvement. The involvement of the 3 white matter bundles during stimulation of the best contacts suggests a mechanism for the observed transient "depression switch." CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This analysis of transient behavior changes during intraoperative deep brain stimulation of the subcallosal cingulate and the subsequent identification of unique connectivity patterns may provide a biomarker of a rapid-onset depression switch to guide surgical implantation and to refine and optimize algorithms for the selection of contacts in long-term stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.