Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26408865›Full record

Trial reportJAMA neurology2015

Mapping the "Depression Switch" During Intraoperative Testing of Subcallosal Cingulate Deep Brain Stimulation.

Ki Sueng Choi, Patricio Riva-Posse, Robert E Gross, Helen S Mayberg

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Field potential 1/Journal of neurophysiology · 2019
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ephaptic coupling and power fluctuations in depression.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Prefrontal Network Mechanisms of Psychiatric Deep Brain Stimulation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation evokes two distinct cortical responses via differential white matter activation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ki Sueng ChoiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Patricio Riva-PosseDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Robert E GrossDepartment of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Helen S MaybergDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia3Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Emory University · US

Funding

Tractography-Activation Models for Neuropsychiatric Deep StimulationR01MH102238 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MCINTYRE, CAMERON · 2014 to 2025
$4.5M
Model-Based Optimization of Clinical Deep Brain StimulationR01NS059736 · NINDS · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI MCINTYRE, CAMERON · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH102238NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS059736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceThe clinical utility of monitoring behavioral changes during intraoperative testing of subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation is unknown.

objectiveTo characterize the structural connectivity correlates of deep brain stimulation-evoked behavioral effects using probabilistic tractography in depression. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsCategorization of acute behavioral effects was conducted in 9 adults undergoing deep brain stimulation implantation surgery for chronic treatment-resistant depression in a randomized and blinded testing session at Emory University. Patients were studied from September 1, 2011, through June 30, 2013. Post hoc analyses of the structural tractography patterns mediating distinct categories of evoked behavioral effects were defined, including the best response overall. Data analyses were performed from May 1 through July 1, 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Categorization of stimulation-induced transient behavioral effects and delineation of the shared white matter tracts mediating response subtypes.

resultsAmong the 9 patients, 72 active and 36 sham trials were recorded. The following stereotypical behavior patterns were identified: changes in interoceptive (noted changes in body state in 30 of 72 active and 4 of 36 sham trials) and in exteroceptive (shift in attention from patient to others in 9 of 72 active and 0 sham trials) awareness. The best response was a combination of exteroceptive and interoceptive changes at a single left contact for all 9 patients. Structural connectivity showed that the best response contacts had a pattern of connections to the bilateral ventromedial frontal cortex (via forceps minor and left uncinate fasciculus) and to the cingulate cortex (via left cingulum bundle), whereas behaviorally salient but nonbest contacts had only cingulate involvement. The involvement of the 3 white matter bundles during stimulation of the best contacts suggests a mechanism for the observed transient "depression switch." CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This analysis of transient behavior changes during intraoperative deep brain stimulation of the subcallosal cingulate and the subsequent identification of unique connectivity patterns may provide a biomarker of a rapid-onset depression switch to guide surgical implantation and to refine and optimize algorithms for the selection of contacts in long-term stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.

Indexed as

AdultBrain MappingCorpus CallosumDeep Brain StimulationDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantFemaleGyrus CinguliHumansIntraoperative Neurophysiological MonitoringMagnetic Resonance ImagingMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedNerve NetNeural PathwaysSingle-Blind Method

Identifiers

PMID26408865
PMCPMC4834289
OpenAlexW1939848850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.