Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26408105›Full record

ReviewThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2015

The challenge of coronary calcium on coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) scans: effect on interpretation and possible solutions.

Makmur Andrew, Hoe John

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. A Novel Cardiac Computed Tomography-Based Calcium Scoring System for Predicting the Use of Atherectomy Devices in Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Makmur AndrewDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. Andrew.makmur@gmail.com.
Hoe JohnDepartment of Radiology, Mt Elizabeth Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. johnwmhoe@gmail.com.
Mount Elizabeth Hospital · SGNational University Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary calcium seen on coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) scans is a common diagnostic challenge which can make interpretation difficult. It is the most common cause of false positive (FP) results from CCTA compared with invasive coronary angiography (ICA), and affects the positive predictive results. At the same time, coronary calcium can result in false negative (FN) results, and this again can affect the reported diagnostic accuracy of CCTA, as the high negative predictive value of CCTA compared to ICA is one of its strengths. This paper reviews the reasons that coronary calcium can cause FP and FN results, and the effects of the morphologies and sizes of the calcified plaques, with particular regard to their relationship with the visualization of the contrast-filled lumen of the coronary artery. Some possible solutions to overcome the limitations of reading CCTA scans with calcified plaques also are discussed, with a view to improving the accuracy of interpreting and reporting CCTA scans; these solutions include using the degree of residual visible contrast-filled lumen to help assess the likelihood of significant associated coronary stenosis, and applying newer technical developments such as dual-energy imaging and volume calcium subtraction.

Indexed as

Multidetector Computed TomographyArtifactsCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsFalse Negative ReactionsFalse Positive ReactionsHumansPlaque, AtheroscleroticPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsVascular CalcificationAngiographyArtifactsCalcified atherosclerotic plaquesComputed tomographyCoronary artery disease

Identifiers

PMID26408105
OpenAlexW2104708690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.