Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26408026›Full record

ArticleJournal of gambling studies2016

Reliability, Validity, and Classification Accuracy of the DSM-5 Diagnostic Criteria for Gambling Disorder and Comparison to DSM-IV.

Randy Stinchfield, John McCready, Nigel E Turner, Susana Jimenez-Murcia, Nancy M Petry, Jon Grant, John Welte, Heather Chapman, Ken C Winters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Incidence and predictors of problem gambling in first-episode psychosis: A prospective multicentre cohort study.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Discounting Behavior in Problem Gambling.Journal of gambling studies · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Randy StinchfieldDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. stinc001@umn.edu.
John McCreadyHealthy Horizons Consulting, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nigel E TurnerCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Susana Jimenez-MurciaDepartment of Psychiatry, University Hospital of Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain.
Nancy M PetryUniversity of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA.
Jon GrantDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
John WelteResearch Institute on Addictions, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Heather ChapmanLouis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Ken C WintersDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

Vulnerabilities for coping-related drinking among post-college young adultsP60AA003510 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI HESSELBROCK, VICTOR M · 2008 to 2017
$17.5M
NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA003510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The DSM-5 was published in 2013 and it included two substantive revisions for gambling disorder (GD). These changes are the reduction in the threshold from five to four criteria and elimination of the illegal activities criterion. The purpose of this study was to twofold. First, to assess the reliability, validity and classification accuracy of the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for GD. Second, to compare the DSM-5-DSM-IV on reliability, validity, and classification accuracy, including an examination of the effect of the elimination of the illegal acts criterion on diagnostic accuracy. To compare DSM-5 and DSM-IV, eight datasets from three different countries (Canada, USA, and Spain; total N = 3247) were used. All datasets were based on similar research methods. Participants were recruited from outpatient gambling treatment services to represent the group with a GD and from the community to represent the group without a GD. All participants were administered a standardized measure of diagnostic criteria. The DSM-5 yielded satisfactory reliability, validity and classification accuracy. In comparing the DSM-5 to the DSM-IV, most comparisons of reliability, validity and classification accuracy showed more similarities than differences. There was evidence of modest improvements in classification accuracy for DSM-5 over DSM-IV, particularly in reduction of false negative errors. This reduction in false negative errors was largely a function of lowering the cut score from five to four and this revision is an improvement over DSM-IV. From a statistical standpoint, eliminating the illegal acts criterion did not make a significant impact on diagnostic accuracy. From a clinical standpoint, illegal acts can still be addressed in the context of the DSM-5 criterion of lying to others.

Indexed as

AdultAmbulatory CareBehavior, AddictiveDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersFemaleGamblingHumansMaleObserver VariationPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesClassification accuracyDiagnosisDSM-5DSM-IVGambling disorder

Identifiers

PMID26408026
PMCPMC4993799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.