ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2015
Spironolactone for Management of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Whither to After TOPCAT?
Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Egypt: An Expert Opinion.Global heart · 2025Review
- Distinct Profiles and New Pharmacological Targets for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- A composite metric for predicting benefit from spironolactone in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2021Observational
- Article
- Treatment of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF): the Phenotype-Guided Approach.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2019Review
- Aldosterone and Mineralocorticoid Receptor System in Cardiovascular Physiology and Pathophysiology.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2018Review
- Designing Future Clinical Trials in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Lessons From TOPCAT.Current heart failure reports · 2017Review
- Advances in the pharmacotherapy of chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: an ideal opportunity for precision medicine.Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy · 2017Review
- How to Develop and Implement a Specialized Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Clinical Program.Current cardiology reports · 2016Review
- The heart in sickle cell disease, a model for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) represent an attractive class of drugs for the treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) because of the deleterious cardiovascular effects of aldosterone and because MRAs combat myocardial fibrosis and improve cardiac structure/function and vascular health. Recently, the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) study, a randomized, double-blind clinical trial of spironolactone versus placebo, was conducted in 3445 patients with symptomatic HFpEF. Although considered by some to be a negative trial, TOPCAT demonstrated that spironolactone decreases heart failure hospitalizations in patients with HFpEF. Furthermore, a pre-specified subgroup analysis of TOPCAT by geographic region uncovered concerning findings from Russia/Georgia, questioning (1) whether the correct patients were enrolled in this region and (2) whether enrolled patients actually received the study drug. In the Americas, spironolactone was clearly superior to placebo in reducing cardiovascular events. Given these data from TOPCAT, basic science evidence for the role of aldosterone in HFpEF, and results from other MRA clinical trials in HFpEF, we advocate using spironolactone in HFpEF with close monitoring of potassium and renal function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.