Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26407978›Full record

ArticleEmergency radiology2016

Head CT scan in Iranian minor head injury patients: evaluating current decision rules.

Robab Sadegh, Ehsan Karimialavijeh, Farzaneh Shirani, Pooya Payandemehr, Hooman Bahramimotlagh, Mahtab Ramezani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Robab SadeghDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Ehsan KarimialavijehDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Kargar Ave., P.O. Box: 14117-13137, Tehran, Iran. e-karimi@sina.tums.ac.ir.
Farzaneh ShiraniDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Kargar Ave., P.O. Box: 14117-13137, Tehran, Iran.
Pooya PayandemehrDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hooman BahramimotlaghDepartment of Radiology, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mahtab RamezaniShahidbeheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Imam Khomeini Hospital · IRShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRShariati Hospital · IRSina Hospital · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study is to select one of the seven available clinical decision rules for minor head injury, for managing Iranian patients. This was a prospective cohort study evaluating medium- or high-risk minor head injury patients presenting to the Emergency Department. Patients with minor head trauma who were eligible for brain imaging based on seven available clinical decision rules (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS)-II, Neurotraumatology Committee of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (NCWFNS), New Orleans, American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) Guideline, Scandinavian, and Canadian computed tomography (CT) head rule) were selected. Subjects were underwent a non-contrast axial spiral head CT scan. The outcome was defined as abnormal and normal head CT scan. Univariate analysis and stepwise linear regression were applied to show the best combination of risk factors for detecting CT scan abnormalities. Five hundred patients with minor head trauma were underwent brain CT scan. The following criteria were derived by stepwise linear regression: Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) less than 15, confusion, signs of basal skull fracture, drug history of warfarin, vomiting more than once, loss of consciousness, focal neurologic deficit, and age over 65 years. This model has 86.15 % (75.33-93.45 %) sensitivity and 46.44 % (46.67-51.25 %) specificity in detecting minor head injury patients with CT scan abnormalities (95 % confidence interval). Of seven decision rules, only the Canadian CT Head Rule possesses seven of the eight high-risk factors associated with abnormal head CT results which were identified by this study. This study underlines the Canadian CT Head Rule's utility in Iranian minor head injury patients. Our study encourages researchers to evaluate available guidelines in different communities.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesAgedAge FactorsCraniocerebral TraumaFemaleGlasgow Coma ScaleHumansIranMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsTomography, X-Ray ComputedWounds, NonpenetratingComputed tomographyDecision modelingHead injury

Identifiers

PMID26407978
OpenAlexW2101128488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.