Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26407273›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society2016

Immunogenicity and Safety of an Inactivated Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in US Children 6-35 Months of Age During 2013-2014: Results From A Phase II Randomized Trial.

Long Wang, Vijayalakshmi Chandrasekaran, Joseph B Domachowske, Ping Li, Bruce L Innis, Varsha K Jain

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01974895 (Immunogenicity and Safety Study of GSK Biologicals' Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01974895 phase2completednot on this map

Immunogenicity and Safety Study of GSK Biologicals' Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (GSK2282512A) in Children 6 to 35 Months of Age

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2013 to 2014Enrolled316ConditionsInfluenzaArmsFluLaval® Quadrivalent, Fluzone®
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Influenza vaccines: Evaluation of the safety profile.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Cost-utility of quadrivalent versus trivalent influenza vaccine in Brazil - comparison of outcomes from different static model types.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Long WangGSK Vaccines, Vaccine Discovery and Development, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania.
Vijayalakshmi ChandrasekaranGSK Vaccines, Biostatistics, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania.
Joseph B DomachowskeSUNY Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse, New York.
Ping LiGSK Vaccines, Biostatistics, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania.
Bruce L InnisGSK Vaccines, Vaccine Discovery and Development, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania.
Varsha K JainGSK Vaccines, Vaccine Discovery and Development, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania.
GlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USSUNY Upstate Medical University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundViruses from 2 influenza B lineages co-circulate, leading to suboptimal protection with trivalent influenza vaccines (TIV). Quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIV) containing both lineages offer broader protection.

methodsWe compared inactivated seasonal QIV versus TIV (15 and 7.5 μg hemagglutinin [HA] for each influenza strain, respectively) in a phase II randomized (1 : 1), observer-blind trial in US children 6-35 months of age (identifier NCT01974895). The primary objective was to evaluate immune responses induced by QIV for the 4 vaccine strains 28 days after completion of vaccination. A secondary objective was to demonstrate superiority of QIV versus TIV for the B/Victoria strain contained in QIV but not TIV. Immunogenicity was evaluated in the per-protocol cohort (N = 280), and safety was evaluated in the intent-to-treat cohort (N = 314).

resultsSeroconversion rates (SCRs) for QIV were 80.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73.0%-86.6%), 72.0% (95% CI, 63.9%-79.2%), 86.0% (95% CI, 79.2%-91.2%), and 66.4% (95% CI, 58.1%-74.1%) for A/H1N1, A/H3N2, B/Yamagata, and B/Victoria, respectively. Quadrivalent influenza vaccines demonstrated immunogenic superiority over TIV for B/Victoria with a geometric mean titer ratio of 4.73 (95% CI, 3.73%-5.99%) and SCR difference of 54.02% (95% CI, 43.88%-62.87%). Safety was similar between the vaccine groups despite the QIV's higher antigen content. No serious adverse events were reported related to vaccination.

conclusionsQuadrivalent influenza vaccine (15 µg HA/strain) was immunogenic with an acceptable safety profile. The next phase of its development in children 6-35 months of age is a phase III trial in countries where it is not yet licensed. In countries where it is already licensed, a switch from TIV to QIV would provide broader protection in this vulnerable group.

Indexed as

Immunogenicity, VaccineAntibodies, ViralChild, PreschoolFemaleHemagglutination Inhibition TestsHumansInfantInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza A Virus, H3N2 SubtypeInfluenza B virusInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMaleSingle-Blind MethodVaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, ViralInfluenza VaccinesVaccines, Inactivatedchildrenimmunogenicityinfluenzaquadrivalentvaccine

Identifiers

PMID26407273
PMCPMC5407130
OpenAlexW2290048361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.