ArticlePloS one2015
Dynamics of Competition between Subnetworks of Spiking Neuronal Networks in the Balanced State.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dissimilarity measures for generalized Lotka-Volterra systems on networks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Heterogeneous and higher-order cortical connectivity undergirds efficient, robust, and reliable neural codes.iScience · 2025Article
- Geometry and dynamics of representations in a precisely balanced memory network related to olfactory cortex.eLife · 2025Article
- A connectome manipulation framework for the systematic and reproducible study of structure-function relationships through simulations.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Specific inhibition and disinhibition in the higher-order structure of a cortical connectome.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- Structural influences on synaptic plasticity: The role of presynaptic connectivity in the emergence of E/I co-tuning.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Emergence of co-tuning in inhibitory neurons as a network phenomenon mediated by randomness, correlations, and homeostatic plasticity.Science advances · 2024Article
- Article
- Bifurcation analysis of the dynamics of interacting subnetworks of a spiking network.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Leveraging heterogeneity for neural computation with fading memory in layer 2/3 cortical microcircuits.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Dynamical modeling of multi-scale variability in neuronal competition.Communications biology · 2019Article
- Winnerless competition in clustered balanced networks: inhibitory assemblies do the trick.Biological cybernetics · 2018Article
- Towards a theory of cortical columns: From spiking neurons to interacting neural populations of finite size.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We explore and analyze the nonlinear switching dynamics of neuronal networks with non-homogeneous connectivity. The general significance of such transient dynamics for brain function is unclear; however, for instance decision-making processes in perception and cognition have been implicated with it. The network under study here is comprised of three subnetworks of either excitatory or inhibitory leaky integrate-and-fire neurons, of which two are of the same type. The synaptic weights are arranged to establish and maintain a balance between excitation and inhibition in case of a constant external drive. Each subnetwork is randomly connected, where all neurons belonging to a particular population have the same in-degree and the same out-degree. Neurons in different subnetworks are also randomly connected with the same probability; however, depending on the type of the pre-synaptic neuron, the synaptic weight is scaled by a factor. We observed that for a certain range of the "within" versus "between" connection weights (bifurcation parameter), the network activation spontaneously switches between the two sub-networks of the same type. This kind of dynamics has been termed "winnerless competition", which also has a random component here. In our model, this phenomenon is well described by a set of coupled stochastic differential equations of Lotka-Volterra type that imply a competition between the subnetworks. The associated mean-field model shows the same dynamical behavior as observed in simulations of large networks comprising thousands of spiking neurons. The deterministic phase portrait is characterized by two attractors and a saddle node, its stochastic component is essentially given by the multiplicative inherent noise of the system. We find that the dwell time distribution of the active states is exponential, indicating that the noise drives the system randomly from one attractor to the other. A similar model for a larger number of populations might suggest a general approach to study the dynamics of interacting populations of spiking networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.