Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26406600›Full record

Trial reportPLoS neglected tropical diseases2015

Assessment of Efficacy and Quality of Two Albendazole Brands Commonly Used against Soil-Transmitted Helminth Infections in School Children in Jimma Town, Ethiopia.

Sileshi Belew, Mestawet Getachew, Sultan Suleman, Tesfaye Mohammed, Habetewold Deti, Matthias D'Hondt, Evelien Wynendaele, Zeleke Mekonnen, Jozef Vercruysse, Luc Duchateau and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Anthelmintic drugs for treating ascariasis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Echinococcosis and Albendazole: A Case for Suitable Treatment.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sileshi BelewSchool of Pharmacy, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia; Drug Quality and Registration Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Mestawet GetachewJimma University Specialized Hospital, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Sultan SulemanSchool of Pharmacy, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia; Drug Quality and Registration Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Tesfaye MohammedSchool of Pharmacy, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Habetewold DetiSchool of Pharmacy, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Matthias D'HondtDrug Quality and Registration Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Evelien WynendaeleDrug Quality and Registration Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Zeleke MekonnenDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences and Pathology, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Jozef VercruysseDepartment of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Luc DuchateauDepartment of Comparative Physiology and Biometrics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Bart De SpiegeleerDrug Quality and Registration Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Bruno LeveckeDepartment of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Ghent University · BEJimma University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a worldwide upscale in mass drug administration (MDA) programs to control the morbidity caused by soil-transmitted helminths (STHs): Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura and hookworm. Although anthelminthic drugs which are used for MDA are supplied by two pharmaceutical companies through donation, there is a wide range of brands available on local markets for which the efficacy against STHs and quality remain poorly explored. In the present study, we evaluated the drug efficacy and quality of two albendazole brands (Bendex and Ovis) available on the local market in Ethiopia. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsA randomized clinical trial was conducted according to the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines to assess drug efficacy, by means of egg reduction rate (ERR), of Bendex and Ovis against STH infections in school children in Jimma, Ethiopia. In addition, the chemical and physicochemical quality of the drugs was assessed according to the United States and European Pharmacopoeia, encompassing mass uniformity of the tablets, amount of active compound and dissolution profile. Both drugs were highly efficacious against A. lumbricoides (>97%), but showed poor efficacy against T. trichiura (~20%). For hookworms, Ovis was significantly (p < 0.05) more efficacious compared to Bendex (98.1% vs. 88.7%). Assessment of the physicochemical quality of the drugs revealed a significant difference in dissolution profile, with Bendex having a slower dissolution than Ovis. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The study revealed that differences in efficacy between the two brands of albendazole (ABZ) tablets against hookworm are linked to the differences in the in-vitro drug release profile. Differences in uptake and metabolism of this benzimidazole drug among different helminth species may explain that this efficacy difference was only observed in hookworms and not in the two other species. The results of the present study underscore the importance of assessing the chemical and physicochemical quality of drugs before conducting efficacy assessment in any clinical trials to ensure appropriate therapeutic efficacy and to exclude poor drug quality as a factor of reduced drug efficacy other than anthelminthic resistance. Overall, this paper demonstrates that "all medicines are not created equal".

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdolescentAlbendazoleAncylostomatoideaAnimalsAnthelminticsAscariasisAscaris lumbricoidesChildChild, PreschoolEthiopiaFemaleHelminthiasisHookworm InfectionsHumansIntestinal Diseases, ParasiticAlbendazoleAnthelminticsTablets

Identifiers

PMID26406600
PMCPMC4583991
OpenAlexW1921993345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.