Trial reportPloS one2015
Long Term Follow-Up after a Randomized Integrated Educational and Psychosocial Intervention in Patient-Partner Dyads Affected by Heart Failure.
Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02398799 (Supporting Dyads Affected by Heart Failure - A Randomised Controlled Study Evaluating a Psychoeducational Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Supporting Dyads Affected by Heart Failure - A Randomised Controlled Study Evaluating a Psychoeducational Intervention
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of interventions for informal caregivers of people with end-stage chronic illness: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Psychological interventions for depression and anxiety in patients with coronary heart disease, heart failure or atrial fibrillation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Social network interventions to support cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention in the management of people with heart disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Multicomponent integrated care for patients with chronic heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis.ESC heart failure · 2023Pooled it
- Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of palliative care interventions in people with chronic heart failure and their caregivers: a systematic review.BMC palliative care · 2022Pooled it
- [Dyadic self-care interventions in chronic heart failure in hospital settings: a systematic review].Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra · 2022Pooled it
- Clinicians for CARE: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Interventions to Support Caregivers of Patients With Heart Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Pooled it
- Effects of psychosocial support interventions on survival in inpatient and outpatient healthcare settings: A meta-analysis of 106 randomized controlled trials.PLoS medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Disease management interventions for heart failure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- A systematic review of heart failure dyadic self-care interventions focusing on intervention components, contexts, and outcomes.International journal of nursing studies · 2018Pooled it
- Multicomponent Palliative Care Interventions in Advanced Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2018Pooled it
- Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Caregivers' Contributions to Heart Failure Self-care: An Updated Systematic Review.The Journal of cardiovascular nursingPooled it
- Effects of exergaming on exercise capacity in patients with heart failure: results of an international multicentre randomized controlled trial.European journal of heart failure · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Long-term effects of a dyadic psycho-educational intervention on caregiver burden and morbidity in partners of patients with heart failure: a randomized controlled trial.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2017Trial
- Large Language Model–Assisted Risk-of-Bias Assessment in Randomized Controlled Trials Using the Revised Risk-of-Bias Tool: Evaluation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Elements Characterising Multicomponent Interventions Used to Improve Disease Management Models and Clinical Pathways in Acute and Chronic Heart Failure: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Intimate Relationships and Coronary Heart Disease: Implications for Risk, Prevention, and Patient Management.Current cardiology reports · 2022Review
- Factors associated with lack of improvement in submaximal exercise capacity of patients with heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo date, contemporary heart failure care remains patient-focused, but awareness of the partners' and families' situation is increasing. Randomized studies have mainly evaluated the short-term effects of dyadic interventions. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the 24-month effects of an intervention with psych-educational support in dyads of heart failure patients and their partners.
methodsThis study used a randomized study design and 155 patient-partner dyads were enrolled. The intervention included a nurse-led program of three sessions addressing psychoeducational support.
resultsThe intervention did not have any effect on health, depressive symptoms or perceived control among the patient-partner dyads after 24 months. Furthermore, time to first event did not differ significantly between the intervention group and the control patients.
conclusionThis study may be regarded as a first step in trying to understand dyads' need for supportive care. Individualized and more targeted interventions seem necessary to achieve a higher impact on dyad outcomes.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02398799.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.