Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26406392›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care2015

Resistant starches for the management of metabolic diseases.

Laure B Bindels, Jens Walter, Amanda E Ramer-Tait

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Laure B BindelsaDepartment of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA bDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science cDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jens Walter
Amanda E Ramer-Tait
University of Nebraska–Lincoln · USFood & Nutrition · NL

Funding

The role of stress in the fetal origin of obesity and metabolic dysfunctionP20GM104320 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI ZEMPLENI, JANOS · 2014 to 2024
$24.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM104320NIGMS NIH HHS P20GM104320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewRecent clinical trials and animal studies indicate that resistant starches may be beneficial therapeutic tools for the management of metabolic diseases. The purpose of this review is to summarize these findings and discuss the established and proposed mechanisms by which resistant starches exert their benefits. We also examine open questions regarding how resistant starches improve metabolism and propose future research directions for the field. RECENT

findingsData from both humans and animal models clearly support a role for resistant starches in improving a variety of metabolic features; however, discrepancies do exist regarding specific effects. Concomitant improvements in both insulin levels and body fat depots are often reported in rodents fed resistant starches, whereas resistant starch feeding in humans improves insulin sensitivity without having a major impact on fat mass. These differences could be explained by the coexistence of several mechanisms (both gut microbiota-dependent and gut microbiota-independent) underpinning the metabolic benefits of resistant starches. SUMMARY: Together, the studies presented in this review offer new insights into the potential pathways by which resistant starches enhance metabolic health, including modulation of the gut microbiota, gut peptides, circulating inflammatory mediators, innate immune cells, and the bile acid cycle.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementGastrointestinal TractInsulin ResistanceAdipose TissueAnimalsDietary FiberDigestionHumansInsulinMetabolic DiseasesStarchDietary FiberInsulinStarch

Identifiers

PMID26406392
PMCPMC4612508
OpenAlexW2468321861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.