Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26406381›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2015

Output Properties of the Cortical Hindlimb Motor Area in Spinal Cord-Injured Rats.

Shawn B Frost, Caleb L Dunham, Scott Barbay, Dora Krizsan-Agbas, Michelle K Winter, David J Guggenmos, Randolph J Nudo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Future of Neuroscience: Flexible and Wireless Implantable Neural Electronics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Thinking Small: Progress on Microscale Neurostimulation Technology.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shawn B Frost1 Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Kansas Medical Center , Kansas City, Kansas.
Caleb L Dunham2 Landon Center On Aging, University of Kansas Medical Center , Kansas City, Kansas.
Scott Barbay2 Landon Center On Aging, University of Kansas Medical Center , Kansas City, Kansas.
Dora Krizsan-Agbas1 Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Kansas Medical Center , Kansas City, Kansas.
Michelle K Winter3 Kansas Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center, University of Kansas Medical Center , Kansas City, Kansas.
David J Guggenmos4 Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center , Kansas City, Kansas.
Randolph J Nudo2 Landon Center On Aging, University of Kansas Medical Center , Kansas City, Kansas.
University of Kansas Medical Center · USUniversity of Kansas · US

Funding

Research Design and Analysis Core (RDAC)P30HD002528 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI COLOMBO, JOHN A. · 1985 to 2015
$22.1M
Reorganization of motor cortex following brain injuryR37NS030853 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI NUDO, RANDOLPH J. · 2008 to 2014
$4.6M
NICHD NIH HHS HD002528NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS030853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine neuronal activity levels in the hindlimb area of motor cortex following spinal cord injury (SCI) in rats and compare the results with measurements in normal rats. Fifteen male Fischer-344 rats received a 200 Kdyn contusion injury in the thoracic cord at level T9-T10. After a minimum of 4 weeks following SCI, intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) and single-unit recording techniques were used in both the forelimb and hindlimb motor areas (FLA, HLA) under ketamine anesthesia. Although movements could be evoked using ICMS in the forelimb area with relatively low current levels, no movements or electromyographical responses could be evoked from ICMS in the HLA in any of the injured rats. During the same procedure, electrophysiological recordings were obtained with a single-shank, 16-channel Michigan probe (Neuronexus) to monitor activity. Neural spikes were discriminated using principle component analysis. Neural activity (action potentials) was collected and digitized for a duration of 5 min. Despite the inability to evoke movement from stimulation of cortex, robust single-unit activity could be recorded reliably from hindlimb motor cortex in SCI rats. Activity in the motor cortex of SCI rats was significantly higher compared with uninjured rats, and increased in hindlimb and forelimb motor cortex by similar amounts. These results demonstrate that in a rat model of thoracic SCI, an increase in single-unit cortical activity can be reliably recorded for several weeks post-injury.

Indexed as

AnimalsElectric StimulationElectroencephalographyElectromyographyElectrophysiological PhenomenaEvoked Potentials, MotorForelimbHindlimbMaleMotor CortexRatsRats, Inbred F344Spinal Cord InjuriesThoracic Vertebraecortical activityhindlimbrat motor cortexspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID26406381
PMCPMC4638198
OpenAlexW2111972991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.