Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26406148›Full record

Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2015

Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma.

Robert J Motzer, Bernard Escudier, David F McDermott, Saby George, Hans J Hammers, Sandhya Srinivas, Scott S Tykodi, Jeffrey A Sosman, Giuseppe Procopio, Elizabeth R Plimack and 18 more

9 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 9 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3,121 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3,121citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
467.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01668784 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study of Nivolumab (BMS-936558) vs. Everolimus in Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Have Received Prior Anti-Angiogenic Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorBristol-Myers SquibbRan2012 to 2021Enrolled821ConditionsAdvanced or Metastatic (Medically or Surgically Unresectable) Clear-cell Renal Cell CarcinomaArmsNivolumab, Everolimus
NCT03075423 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label Study of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab Versus Standard of Care in Subjects With Previously Untreated and Advanced (Unresectable or Metastatic) Non-clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (nccRCC)

TypeinterventionalSponsorGoethe UniversityRan2017 to 2023Enrolled316ConditionsMetastatic Renal Cell CarcinomaArmsIpilimumab plus nivolumab, Standard Therapy
NCT03149822 phase1 / phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Phase I/II Study of Pembrolizumab and Cabozantinib in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2017 to 2024Enrolled45ConditionsMetastatic Renal Cell CarcinomaArmsCabozantinib, Pembrolizumab
NCT03651271 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

An Exploratory Study of Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab According to the Percentage of Tumoral CD8 Cells in Participants With Advanced Metastatic Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorParker Institute for Cancer ImmunotherapyRan2018 to 2023Enrolled100ConditionsAdvanced Metastatic Cancer, Advanced Prostate CancerArmsNivolumab Monotherapy, Nivolumab and Ipilimumab and Combination for Metastatic Cancer, Nivolumab and Ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) Combination for Prostate Cancer, Nivolumab and Ipilimumab (5 mg/kg) Combination for Prostate Cancer
NCT03673332 phase4terminatednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Elderly Cancer PatIents Treated for Advanced or Metastatic Melanoma or NSCLC, Safety and qualiTy of Life Under immunOtheraPies: a Phase IV Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut Paoli-CalmettesRan2019 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsAdvanced or Metastatic Melanoma, Advanced or Metastatic NSCLCArmsimmune-checkpoint inhibitors therapies
NCT03692533 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Role of Immunohistochemical Markers , Geminin and Mcm2 in Prognosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma, and Its Clinicopathological Correlation. A Prospective Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2018 to 2020Enrolled80ConditionsRenal Cell CarcinomaArmsImmunohistochemistry
NCT04761744 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Phase II Study of Nivolumab in Patients With Genetic Alterations in DNA Damage Repair and Response Who Progressed After Standard Treatment for Metastatic Solid Cancers

TypeinterventionalSponsorKorean Cancer Study GroupRan2019 to 2021Enrolled48ConditionsDDR Gene Mutation, Metastatic Solid TumorArmsNivolumab
NCT04891055 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Translational Study Investigating Predictors of Outcome in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated With Nivolumab (I-Rene Trial)

TypeobservationalSponsorFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, MilanoRan2018 to 2021Enrolled90ConditionsMetastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
NCT07117409 terminatednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Retrospective Observational Study on the Safety of Nivolumab in Patients With Metastatic Renal Carcinoma and Renal Failure

TypeobservationalSponsorAzienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCSRan2020 to 2025Enrolled81ConditionsMetastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3,121 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5,840 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Treatments for renal cell carcinoma: NICE Pilot Treatment Pathways Appraisal.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Combined Targeting of PD-1 and TIM-3 in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: AMBER Part 2B.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

3,061 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 20 institutions in 16 countries.

Robert J MotzerFrom Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (R.J.M.), and Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo (S.G.) - both in New York; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif (B.E.), and Bordeaux University Hospital, Hôpital Saint André, Bordeaux (A.R.) - both in France; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) - all in Boston; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore (H.J.H.); Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA (S.S.); University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.S.T.); Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (J.A.S.); Fondazione Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan (G.P.); Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (E.R.P.); Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre, Madrid (D.C.); Westmead Hospital and Macquarie University, Sydney (H.G.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (F.D.); Helsinki University Central Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki (P.B.); South West Wales Cancer Institute and Swansea University College of Medicine, Swansea (J.W.), and Royal Marsden Hospital, London (J.L.) - both in the United Kingdom; University Hospital Essen of University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany (T.C.G.); Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba (T.U.), and Niigata University, Niigata (Y.T.) - both in Japan; Hospital Sao Jose, Beneficencia Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo (F.A.S.); British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada (C.K.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville (J.S.S., I.M.W.) and Hopewell (L.-A.X.) - both in New Jersey; and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston (P.S.).
Bernard Escudier
David F McDermott
Saby George
Hans J Hammers
Sandhya Srinivas
Scott S Tykodi
Jeffrey A Sosman
Giuseppe Procopio
Elizabeth R Plimack
Daniel Castellano
Toni K Choueiri
Howard Gurney
Frede Donskov
Petri Bono
John Wagstaff
Thomas C Gauler
Takeshi Ueda
Yoshihiko Tomita
Fabio A Schutz
Christian Kollmannsberger
James Larkin
Alain Ravaud
Jason S Simon
Li-An Xu
Ian M Waxman
Padmanee Sharma
CheckMate 025 Investigators
Bristol-Myers Squibb (Belgium) · BEAarhus University Hospital · DKBC Cancer Agency · CABeneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo · BRBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCancer Institute (WIA) · INCancer Prevention Institute of California · USChiba Cancer Center · JPFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITFox Chase Cancer Center · USHadassah Medical Center · ILHelsinki University Hospital · FIHôpital Saint-André · FRHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRJohns Hopkins University · USMacquarie University · AUNiigata University of Management · JPRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USRoyal Marsden Hospital · GB

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNivolumab, a programmed death 1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitor, was associated with encouraging overall survival in uncontrolled studies involving previously treated patients with advanced renal-cell carcinoma. This randomized, open-label, phase 3 study compared nivolumab with everolimus in patients with renal-cell carcinoma who had received previous treatment.

methodsA total of 821 patients with advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma for which they had received previous treatment with one or two regimens of antiangiogenic therapy were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive 3 mg of nivolumab per kilogram of body weight intravenously every 2 weeks or a 10-mg everolimus tablet orally once daily. The primary end point was overall survival. The secondary end points included the objective response rate and safety.

resultsThe median overall survival was 25.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.8 to not estimable) with nivolumab and 19.6 months (95% CI, 17.6 to 23.1) with everolimus. The hazard ratio for death with nivolumab versus everolimus was 0.73 (98.5% CI, 0.57 to 0.93; P=0.002), which met the prespecified criterion for superiority (P≤0.0148). The objective response rate was greater with nivolumab than with everolimus (25% vs. 5%; odds ratio, 5.98 [95% CI, 3.68 to 9.72]; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.4) with nivolumab and 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.5) with everolimus (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.03; P=0.11). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 19% of the patients receiving nivolumab and in 37% of the patients receiving everolimus; the most common event with nivolumab was fatigue (in 2% of the patients), and the most common event with everolimus was anemia (in 8%).

conclusionsAmong patients with previously treated advanced renal-cell carcinoma, overall survival was longer and fewer grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred with nivolumab than with everolimus. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; CheckMate 025 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01668784.).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Renal CellEverolimusFemaleHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNivolumabQuality of LifeSirolimusAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsEverolimusNivolumabSirolimus

Identifiers

PMID26406148
PMCPMC5719487
OpenAlexW2222086386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

and 3 more above

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.