ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2015
Response to Comment on "Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds".
Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Dinosaurs: Comparative Cytogenomics of Their Reptile Cousins and Avian Descendants.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Review
- Investigating the reliability of molecular estimates of evolutionary time when substitution rates and speciation rates vary.BMC ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Fourth Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2022.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2022Review
- Divergence time estimation of Galliformes based on the best gene shopping scheme of ultraconserved elements.BMC ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Inferring the Total-Evidence Timescale of Marattialean Fern Evolution in the Face of Model Sensitivity.Systematic biology · 2021Article
- Time lapse: A glimpse into prehistoric genomics.European journal of medical genetics · 2020Review
- Filtering nucleotide sites by phylogenetic signal to noise ratio increases confidence in the Neoaves phylogeny generated from ultraconserved elements.Molecular phylogenetics and evolution · 2018Article
- Reconstruction of the diapsid ancestral genome permits chromosome evolution tracing in avian and non-avian dinosaurs.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Genomic Signature of an Avian Lilliput Effect across the K-Pg Extinction.Systematic biology · 2018Article
- Genome Sequence of Peacock Reveals the Peculiar Case of a Glittering Bird.Frontiers in genetics · 2018Article
- Total evidence phylogeny and evolutionary timescale for Australian faunivorous marsupials (Dasyuromorphia).BMC evolutionary biology · 2017Article
- Big-time insights from a tiny bird fossil.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- Tectonic collision and uplift of Wallacea triggered the global songbird radiation.Nature communications · 2016Article
- Advances in Time Estimation Methods for Molecular Data.Molecular biology and evolution · 2016Article
- A new time tree reveals Earth history's imprint on the evolution of modern birds.Science advances · 2015Article
- Temporal genomic evolution of bird sex chromosomes.BMC evolutionary biology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mitchell et al. argue that divergence-time estimates for our avian phylogeny were too young because of an "inappropriate" maximum age constraint for the most recent common ancestor of modern birds and that, as a result, most modern bird orders diverged before the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction event 66 million years ago instead of after. However, their interpretations of the fossil record and timetrees are incorrect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26404820What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.