ReviewWiener klinische Wochenschrift2015
Advanced therapies of skin injuries.
Review in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- AnACS applied bio materials · 2025Article
- Nrf2 activation: a key mechanism in stem cell exosomes-mediated therapies.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2024Review
- Antibiotics againstPharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Article
- Multilayer Methacrylate-Based Wound Dressing as a Therapeutic Tool for Targeted Pain Relief.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Status and Future Scope of Soft Nanoparticles-Based Hydrogel in Wound Healing.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Electronic Alert Signal for Early Detection of Tissue Injuries in Patients: An Innovative Pressure Sensor Mattress.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Functional Thermoresponsive Hydrogel Molecule to Material Design for Biomedical Applications.Polymers · 2022Review
- Self-Healing Hydrogels: Preparation, Mechanism and Advancement in Biomedical Applications.Polymers · 2021Review
- Rat epidermal stem cells promote the angiogenesis of full-thickness wounds.Stem cell research & therapy · 2020Article
- Intervertebral disc tissue engineering: A brief review.Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences · 2019Review
- Functional Skin Grafts: Where Biomaterials Meet Stem Cells.Stem cells international · 2019Review
- Article
- Article
- Immunological challenges associated with artificial skin grafts: available solutions and stem cells in future design of synthetic skin.Journal of biological engineering · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The loss of tissue is still one of the most challenging problems in healthcare. Efficient laboratory expansion of skin tissue to reproduce the skins barrier function can make the difference between life and death for patients with extensive full-thickness burns, chronic wounds, or genetic disorders such as bullous conditions. This engineering has been initiated based on the acute need in the 1980s and today, tissue-engineered skin is the reality. The human skin equivalents are available not only as models for permeation and toxicity screening, but are frequently applied in vivo as clinical skin substitutes. This review aims to introduce the most important recent development in the extensive field of tissue engineering and to describe already approved, commercially available skin substitutes in clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26404739What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.