Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26404377›Full record

ReviewToxins2015

Botulinum Toxin Type a as a Therapeutic Agent against Headache and Related Disorders.

Siro Luvisetto, Parisa Gazerani, Carlo Cianchetti, Flaminia Pavone

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. XeominToxins · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Bacterial AB toxins and host-microbe interactions.Advances in microbial physiology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Siro LuvisettoNational Research Council (CNR) of Italy, Institute of Cell Biology and Neurobiology, Roma 00185, Italy. siro.luvisetto@cnr.it.
Parisa GazeraniCenter for Sensory-Motor Interaction, Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg East 9220, Denmark. gazerani@hst.aau.dk.
Carlo CianchettiFormer Professor of Child & Adolescent Neuropsychiatry, University of Cagliari, Cagliari 09124, Italy. cianchet@unica.it.
Flaminia PavoneNational Research Council (CNR) of Italy, Institute of Cell Biology and Neurobiology, Roma 00185, Italy. flaminia.pavone@cnr.it.
Aalborg University · DKInstitute of Cell Biology and Neurobiology · ITNational Research Council · ITUniversity of Cagliari · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT/A) is a toxin produced by the naturally-occurring Clostridium botulinum that causes botulism. The potential of BoNT/A as a useful medical intervention was discovered by scientists developing a vaccine to protect against botulism. They found that, when injected into a muscle, BoNT/A causes a flaccid paralysis. Following this discovery, BoNT/A has been used for many years in the treatment of conditions of pathological muscle hyperactivity, like dystonias and spasticities. In parallel, the toxin has become a "glamour" drug due to its power to ward off facial wrinkles, particularly frontal, due to the activity of the mimic muscles. After the discovery that the drug also appeared to have a preventive effect on headache, scientists spent many efforts to study the potentially-therapeutic action of BoNT/A against pain. BoNT/A is effective at reducing pain in a number of disease states, including cervical dystonia, neuropathic pain, lower back pain, spasticity, myofascial pain and bladder pain. In 2010, regulatory approval for the treatment of chronic migraine with BoNT/A was given, notwithstanding the fact that the mechanism of action is still not completely elucidated. In the present review, we summarize experimental evidence that may help to clarify the mechanisms of action of BoNT/A in relation to the alleviation of headache pain, with particular emphasis on preclinical studies, both in animals and humans. Moreover, we summarize the latest clinical trials that show evidence on headache conditions that may obtain benefits from therapy with BoNT/A.

Indexed as

AnimalsBotulinum Toxins, Type ADisease Models, AnimalDystoniaHeadacheHumansMigraine DisordersMuscle SpasticityNeuralgiaNeuromuscular AgentsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBotulinum Toxins, Type ANeuromuscular Agentsanimal pain modelbotulinum toxincephalalgiasclinical trialscluster headacheheadachehuman pain modelmigrainetension-type headache

Identifiers

PMID26404377
PMCPMC4591645
OpenAlexW1806864071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.