Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26404376›Full record

ReviewToxins2015

Mass Spectrometric Detection of Bacterial Protein Toxins and Their Enzymatic Activity.

Suzanne R Kalb, Anne E Boyer, John R Barr

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Conflicting Clinical Presentation of Infection withJournal of pediatrics. Clinical practice · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Fighting Cancer with Bacteria and Their Toxins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Foodomics and Food Safety: Where We Are.Food technology and biotechnology · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suzanne R KalbCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy NE, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. skalb@cdc.gov.
Anne E BoyerCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy NE, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. aboyer@cdc.gov.
John R BarrCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy NE, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. jbarr@cdc.gov.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass spectrometry has recently become a powerful technique for bacterial identification. Mass spectrometry approaches generally rely upon introduction of the bacteria into a matrix-assisted laser-desorption time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometer with mass spectrometric recognition of proteins specific to that organism that form a reliable fingerprint. With some bacteria, such as Bacillus anthracis and Clostridium botulinum, the health threat posed by these organisms is not the organism itself, but rather the protein toxins produced by the organisms. One such example is botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT), a potent neurotoxin produced by C. botulinum. There are seven known serotypes of BoNT, A-G, and many of the serotypes can be further differentiated into toxin variants, which are up to 99.9% identical in some cases. Mass spectrometric proteomic techniques have been established to differentiate the serotype or toxin variant of BoNT produced by varied strains of C. botulinum. Detection of potent biological toxins requires high analytical sensitivity and mass spectrometry based methods have been developed to determine the enzymatic activity of BoNT and the anthrax lethal toxins produced by B. anthracis. This enzymatic activity, unique for each toxin, is assessed with detection of the toxin-induced cleavage of strategically designed peptide substrates by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry offering unparalleled specificity. Furthermore, activity assays allow for the assessment of the biological activity of a toxin and its potential health risk. Such methods have become important diagnostics for botulism and anthrax. Here, we review mass spectrometry based methods for the enzymatic activity of BoNT and the anthrax lethal factor toxin.

Indexed as

Antigens, BacterialBacillus anthracisBacterial ProteinsBacterial ToxinsBotulinum Toxins, Type AClostridium botulinumNeurotoxinsProteomicsSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionizationanthrax toxinAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsBacterial ToxinsBotulinum Toxins, Type ANeurotoxinsanthraxanthrax lethal factorbotulinum neurotoxinbotulismmass spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID26404376
PMCPMC4591662
OpenAlexW1946551871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.