Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26404123›Full record

ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2015

Controversies in the management of endometrial cancer: a survey of the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group.

Jung Yun Lee, Kidong Kim, Taek Sang Lee, Sokbom Kang, Seok Ju Seong, Jae Weon Kim, Byoung Gie Kim

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Correlation between estrogen receptor and programmed death ligand-1 in type I endometrial cancer.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2024
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jung Yun LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kidong KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
Taek Sang LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. tslee70@gmail.com.
Sokbom KangCenter for Uterine Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Seok Ju SeongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University, Seoul, Korea.
Jae Weon KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Byoung Gie KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seoul National University · KRCHA University · KRNational Cancer Center · KRSamsung Medical Center · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify current practice patterns for unresolved issues in the surgical and adjuvant management of endometrial cancer in Korea.

methodsWe designed and conducted a survey of all 218 active members of the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group to try to identify how they would manage various case scenarios for endometrial cancer. Data were collected using an Internet survey database.

resultsA total of 108 members (49.5%) responded to the survey. Laparoscopy (81.6%) was the most commonly used mode of surgery in early-stage endometrial cancer. Of all the respondents, 19.8% stated that lymphadenectomy could be omitted and 21.7% recommended selective lymphadenectomy based on sentinel biopsy or frozen results for patients with presumed stage IA/grade 1 disease. On the other hand, 71.9% of respondents recommended para-aortic lymphadenectomy for patients with presumed stage IB/grade 1 disease and 86.4% recommended this treatment for presumed stage IB/grade 3 disease. The majority of respondents performed adjuvant therapy for stage IB/grade 2 (91.7%), IB/grade 3 (99.0%), and stage II (89.6%). Whole pelvic radiotherapy and vaginal brachytherapy were the most frequently used options among these patients. All respondents administered adjuvant therapy when node metastasis was found, and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (53.2%) was the most preferred option for stage IIIC1 disease.

conclusionThere is broad variation in both the surgical and adjuvant treatment of endometrial cancer among Korean gynecologic oncologists.

Indexed as

GynecologyAdultCombined Modality TherapyEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIncidental FindingsLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPersonal SatisfactionPractice Patterns, Physicians'Republic of KoreaAdjuvant TherapyData CollectionEndometrial NeoplasmsLymph Node ExcisionPractice Pattern

Identifiers

PMID26404123
PMCPMC4620364
OpenAlexW2112026116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.