Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26403912›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2016

Survival and local control rates of triple-negative breast cancer patients treated with boost-IOERT during breast-conserving surgery.

Gerd Fastner, Cornelia Hauser-Kronberger, Angelika Moder, Roland Reitsamer, Franz Zehentmayr, Peter Kopp, Christoph Fussl, Thorsten Fischer, Heinrich Deutschmann, Felix Sedlmayer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. DEGRO practical guidelines for radiotherapy of breast cancer VI: therapy of locoregional breast cancer recurrences.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2016
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Is prone free breathing better than supine deep inspiration breath-hold for left whole-breast radiotherapy? A dosimetric analysis.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Intraoperative radiotherapy boost as part of breast-conservation therapy for breast cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Article
  8. Chronic toxicity and long-term outcome in intraoperative electron radiotherapy as boost followed by whole-breast irradiation.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) as boost in breast cancer.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2017
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Targeted intraoperative radiotherapy tumour bed boost during breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gerd FastnerDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, Landeskrankenhaus, Paracelsus Medical University, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria. g.fastner@salk.at.
Cornelia Hauser-KronbergerDepartment of Pathology, Landeskrankenhaus, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Angelika ModerInstitute of Inborn Errors in Metabolism, Landeskrankenhaus, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Roland ReitsamerDepartment of Special Gynecology, Landeskrankenhaus, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Franz ZehentmayrDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, Landeskrankenhaus, Paracelsus Medical University, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Peter KoppDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, Landeskrankenhaus, Paracelsus Medical University, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Christoph FusslDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, Landeskrankenhaus, Paracelsus Medical University, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Thorsten FischerDepartment of Special Gynecology, Landeskrankenhaus, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Heinrich DeutschmannDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, Landeskrankenhaus, Paracelsus Medical University, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Felix SedlmayerDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, Landeskrankenhaus, Paracelsus Medical University, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Paracelsus Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe purpose of this work was to retrospectively evaluate survival and local control rates of triple-negative breast cancer subtypes classified as five marker negative (5NP) and core basal (CB), respectively, after breast-conserving surgery and intraoperative boost radiotherapy with electrons (IOERT) followed by whole breast irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 71 patients with triple-negative breast cancer were enrolled, who were treated with lumpectomy, axillary lymph node dissection, and IOERT with 9.6 Gy (median Dmax) followed by normofractionated whole breast irradiation to median total doses of 54 Gy. Chemotherapy was applied in a neoadjuvant (12 %), adjuvant (75 %), or combinational setting (7 %).

resultsAfter a median follow-up of 97 months (range 4-170 months), 5 in-breast recurrences were detected (7.0 %). For all patients, 8-year actuarial rates for local control, metastases-free survival, disease-specific survival, and overall survival amounted to 89, 75, 80, and 69 %, respectively. All local recurrences occurred in grade 3 (G3) tumors irrespective of their specific immunohistochemical phenotype; thus, the local control rate for grades 1/2 (G1/2) was 100 % for both 5NP and CB, while for G3 it was 88 % for 5NP and 90 % for CB (p = 0.65 and 0.82, respectively, n.s.). For disease-specific survival, only the difference of the best-prognosis group 5-NP/G3 vs. the worst-prognosis cohort CB/G1/2 was statistically significant: 90 % vs. 54 % (p = 0.03).

conclusionBoost-IOERT provides acceptable long-term in-breast control in triple negative breast cancer. The best subgroup in terms of disease-specific survival was represented by 5NP in combination with tumor grading G3.

Indexed as

Lymph Node ExcisionMastectomy, SegmentalActuarial AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularChemotherapy, AdjuvantCohort StudiesCombined Modality TherapyDose Fractionation, RadiationElectronsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntraoperative PeriodNeoplasm StagingBiomarkers, TumorBreast conserving surgeryElectronsIntraoperative radiotherapyRecurrenceTriple-negative breast neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID26403912
OpenAlexW2180206039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.