ArticleJournal of safety research2015
Naturalistic teenage driving study: Findings and lessons learned.
Article in Journal of safety research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Distracted Walking, Bicycling, and Driving: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mobile Technology and Youth Crash Risk.Child development · 2018Pooled it
- Trial of Training to Reduce Driver Inattention in Teens with ADHD.The New England journal of medicine · 2022Trial
- Naturalistic driving data extraction and processing for studying driver head scanning behavior at intersections.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparing the Driving Skills of Adolescents with Obstructive Sleep Apnea to Healthy Controls: The Results of a Case-Controlled Observational Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Driving after pediatric traumatic brain injury: Impact of distraction and executive functioning.Rehabilitation psychology · 2020Article
- Technology-Based Interventions, Assessments, and Solutions for Safe Driving Training for Adolescents: Rapid Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2019Review
- The Effect of Teenage Passengers on Simulated Risky Driving Among Teenagers: A Randomized Trial.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Vehicle ownership and other predictors of teenagers risky driving behavior: Evidence from a naturalistic driving study.Accident; analysis and prevention · 2018Article
- Measuring Risky Driving Behavior Using an mHealth Smartphone App: Development and Evaluation of gForce.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2018Article
- Driving in search of analyses.Statistics in medicine · 2017Article
- Physicians' role in the determination of fitness to drive in patients with Parkinson's disease: systematic review of the assessment tools and a call for national guidelines.Journal of clinical movement disorders · 2016Review
- Estimates of prevalence and risk associated with inattention and distraction based upon in situ naturalistic data.Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific ConferenceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThis paper summarizes the findings on novice teenage driving outcomes (e.g., crashes and risky driving behaviors) from the Naturalistic Teenage Driving Study.
methodSurvey and driving data from a data acquisition system (global positioning system, accelerometers, cameras) were collected from 42 newly licensed teenage drivers and their parents during the first 18 months of teenage licensure; stress responsivity was also measured in teenagers.
resultOverall teenage crash and near-crash (CNC) rates declined over time, but were >4 times higher among teenagers than adults. Contributing factors to teenage CNC rates included secondary task engagement (e.g., distraction), kinematic risky driving, low stress responsivity, and risky social norms.
conclusionsThe data support the contention that the high novice teenage CNC risk is due both to inexperience and risky driving behavior, particularly kinematic risky driving and secondary task engagement. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: Graduated driver licensing policy and other prevention efforts should focus on kinematic risky driving, secondary task engagement, and risky social norms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.